H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Rebeka Masarova holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Baindl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebeka Masarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebeka Masarova won the 2023 Guangzhou Open first round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Baindl | 6-2 6-4 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data | Sep 29, 2023 | Q1 | China Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Rebeka Masarova | 7-5 6-2 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data | Sep 20, 2023* | R32 | Guangzhou Open | WTA 250 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | #180 | #62 | 982 | 1,800 | 35 | 45 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,726 | 75 | 106 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #91 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #180 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2016 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 2023 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2017 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 2018 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2019 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2020 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 20 | 24 | 44 | 45.5% | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | — | 45 | 67 | 112 | 40.2% | 26 | 28 | 54 | 48.1% | 4 | 11 | 15 | 26.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/80 of Rebeka Masarova's and 173/182 of Kateryna Baindl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 4/4 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 61.9% | 61.0% | 47.1% | 48.5% | 64.9% | 55.3% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 47.9% | 67.1% | 39.4% | 46.5% | 50.0% | 52.7% | 42.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 71.3% | 54.3% | 42.0% | 66.6% | 57.1% | 50.4% | 44.5% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4/4 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 66.7% | 56.2% | 45.3% | 55.8% | 63.1% | 52.6% | 41.7% |
| 21 | 2021 | 3/3 | 6.0 | 3.3 | 58.7% | 65.1% | 40.5% | 60.6% | 47.2% | 54.8% | 28.3% | 2015 | 9/15 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 66.8% | 56.0% | 50.4% | 56.2% | 48.2% | 54.4% | 35.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 4.5 | 61.0% | 57.7% | 43.9% | 53.7% | 39.5% | 52.3% | 40.0% | 2016 | 23/24 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 69.0% | 60.2% | 46.4% | 48.2% | 50.7% | 56.0% | 46.4% |
| 23 | 2023 | 30/30 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 67.4% | 66.9% | 45.4% | 57.5% | 43.9% | 60.1% | 40.4% | 2017 | 19/19 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 68.8% | 58.9% | 46.1% | 51.0% | 50.3% | 54.9% | 45.8% |
| 24 | 2024 | 17/17 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 63.2% | 61.1% | 41.6% | 56.7% | 41.3% | 53.7% | 41.4% | 2018 | 26/27 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 65.3% | 60.6% | 42.7% | 46.1% | 48.3% | 54.5% | 42.1% |
| 25 | 2025 | 7/9 | 6.1 | 3.7 | 57.4% | 70.5% | 43.1% | 43.5% | 62.9% | 59.0% | 39.6% | 2019 | 28/29 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 64.8% | 59.1% | 43.5% | 45.1% | 53.4% | 53.6% | 46.1% |
| 26 | 2026 | 11/11 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 60.6% | 72.5% | 40.6% | 54.1% | 42.3% | 59.8% | 37.2% | 2020 | 8/8 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 68.5% | 58.3% | 42.0% | 44.4% | 56.6% | 53.0% | 43.3% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20/20 | 1.1 | 5.1 | 68.9% | 60.3% | 41.4% | 45.1% | 47.8% | 54.3% | 43.7% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9/9 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 75.7% | 59.2% | 38.1% | 57.8% | 50.5% | 54.1% | 47.0% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22/22 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 73.0% | 58.4% | 42.7% | 48.8% | 49.1% | 53.8% | 42.7% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 68.6% | 51.7% | 14.8% | 26.8% | 25.0% | 40.1% | 39.0% |
| Career | — | 78/80 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 63.2% | 65.9% | 43.3% | 54.8% | 46.0% | 57.5% | 39.8% | — | 173/182 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 68.4% | 59.1% | 43.4% | 48.4% | 50.4% | 54.1% | 43.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1553 | 107.1 | +1.30 | -0.45 | 0.980 | 50.1% | — | +42 | — | 60.0% | +0.30 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1523 | 98.7 | -1.35 | -3.26 | 0.903 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1487 | 98.2 | -2.57 | -1.35 | 0.897 | 47.5% | +20 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.13 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.31 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1477 | 103.7 | -1.18 | -0.33 | 0.880 | 48.0% | +14 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.24 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1531 | 109.3 | +0.37 | -2.98 | 0.626 | 43.0% | -20 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.08 | 2015 | 1473 | 103.5 | -1.86 | -3.84 | 0.768 | 45.2% | +3 | — | — | 32.3% | -1.39 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1601 | 101.1 | -2.13 | -2.04 | 0.839 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.38 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.29 | 2016 | 1609 | 123.4 | +0.05 | +1.48 | 1.055 | 51.1% | -22 | -19 | +18 | 52.9% | +0.22 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.8 | -0.71 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1711 | 131.5 | +2.59 | -2.27 | 1.012 | 50.3% | -32 | +20 | -134 | 55.2% | +0.10 | 6–5 (55%) | 9–2 (82%) | 105.3 | -1.09 | 2017 | 1566 | 112.7 | -0.46 | +1.02 | 1.017 | 50.1% | -42 | +43 | — | 40.5% | -0.38 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–6 (25%) | 92.9 | +0.43 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1609 | 118.0 | -1.54 | -1.72 | 0.896 | 47.7% | +2 | +49 | -16 | 35.7% | -1.05 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–1 (75%) | 99.1 | -0.87 | 2018 | 1527 | 113.1 | -1.72 | -1.69 | 0.925 | 48.4% | -7 | +57 | — | 50.0% | -0.26 | 1–7 (13%) | 5–2 (71%) | 95.3 | +1.44 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1710 | 130.9 | +0.55 | -0.81 | 0.965 | 49.4% | -46 | +79 | — | 52.4% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–2 | — | -0.89 | 2019 | 1664 | 128.4 | -2.21 | +1.99 | 0.993 | 49.8% | -64 | +78 | — | 48.4% | -0.10 | 4–6 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.33 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1635 | 121.4 | +0.94 | -2.72 | 0.925 | 48.3% | -21 | +119 | — | 44.4% | -0.52 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–1 | — | -0.44 | 2020 | 1624 | 122.7 | -1.33 | -0.67 | 0.920 | 48.5% | -26 | — | — | 36.8% | -0.68 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.16 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1691 | 123.1 | -0.60 | -0.16 | 0.955 | 48.9% | -72 | +77 | -49 | 45.1% | -0.29 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.7 | -0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1679 | 115.5 | -0.68 | +1.66 | 1.024 | 50.5% | — | +142 | — | 38.9% | -1.06 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.78 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1618 | 113.8 | -2.11 | -0.60 | 0.924 | 48.4% | -12 | +99 | — | 42.0% | -0.68 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.6 | +1.59 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1551 | 97.6 | -1.46 | -2.17 | 0.652 | 39.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| Career | — | 1801 | 126.8 | +0.78 | -2.03 | 0.938 | 48.8% | -24 | +57 | -95 | 44.9% | -0.46 | 17–14 (55%) | 17–9 (65%) | 106.9 | -3.88 | — | 1726 | 122.5 | -1.28 | +0.08 | 0.957 | 49.1% | -25 | +70 | -16 | 44.1% | -0.46 | 20–38 (34%) | 20–21 (49%) | 91.7 | +1.63 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xinyu Wang | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Marketa Vondrousova | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 16, 2024 | H2H |
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 24, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jan 16, 2020 | H2H |
| Laura Siegemund | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 3, 2024 | H2H |
| Madison Brengle | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 9, 2021 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 2 | 2 | 4 | Sep 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 22, 2023 | H2H |