H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rebeka Masarova vs Kateryna Baindl H2H: 1-0
Rebeka Masarova holds a 1–0 lead over Kateryna Baindl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rebeka Masarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rebeka Masarova won the 2023 Guangzhou third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 26
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 32
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2023 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Kateryna Baindl | 6-2 6-4 | Rebeka Masarova | Match data |
| Sep 20, 2023* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rebeka Masarova | 7-5 6-2 | Kateryna Baindl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rebeka Masarova | #166 | #62 | 982 | 1,799 | 37 | 46 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kateryna Baindl | #467 | #62 | 922 | 1,730 | 75 | 107 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rebeka Masarova | Kateryna Baindl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #311 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #140 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #130 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #102 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #144 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #116 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #91 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #166 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #106 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #144 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #99 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #132 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |