H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Sachia Vickery vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2015 Nottingham third round 7-6(2) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Sachia Vickery | 7-6(2) 7-5 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sachia Vickery | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |