H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Simona Halep H2H: 0-3
Simona Halep holds a 3–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Simona Halep leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2021 Madrid third round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2021* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Simona Halep | 6-0 6-4 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2018* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Simona Halep | 7-5 6-0 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2015* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Simona Halep | 6-2 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Simona Halep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 |