H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Yaroslava Shvedova H2H: 0-2
Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 2–0 lead over Saisai Zheng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2016 Wuhan second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2016* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-0 6-3 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
| Apr 2, 2014* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-2 3-6 7-5 | Saisai Zheng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Yaroslava Shvedova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |