H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shahar Peer vs Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik H2H: 0-2
Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik holds a 2–0 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik won the 2013 Budapest quarterfinal 6-0 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 39
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2013* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | 6-0 7-5 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2013* | Katowice | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Shahar Peer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | #1,185 | #11 | 3,410 | 1,966 | 268 | 204 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | #1,168 | #59 | 972 | 1,601 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shahar Peer | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #176 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #45 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #20 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #61 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #17 | 1,830 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #236 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #38 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #157 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #30 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 47–21 | 69.1% | #13 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #37 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #74 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #117 | 1,539 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,526 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |