H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Shelby Rogers vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-0

Shelby Rogers holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shelby Rogers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2016 Acapulco round of 32 7-6(6) 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anna Tatishvili
United States Age 36 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelby Rogers #108 7-6(6) 6-0 Anna Tatishvili #117 Match data Feb 25, 2016* R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anna Tatishvili #1,071 #50 1,210 1,615 44 93 32.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Shelby Rogers Anna Tatishvili
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #1156 1,485 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #302 1,502 0 0
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0 2007 1–5 16.7% #285 1,456 0 0
18 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #160 1,444 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–2 0.0% #177 1,423 0 0
20 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0 2010 4–6 40.0% #134 1,467 0 0
21 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0 2011 7–14 33.3% #89 1,493 0 0
22 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0 2012 16–18 47.1% #51 1,602 0 0
23 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0 2013 4–18 18.2% #127 1,492 0 0
24 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0 2014 0–6 0.0% #146 1,438 0 0
25 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0 2015 7–8 46.7% #101 1,507 0 0
26 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0 2016 3–8 27.3% #200 1,464 0 0
27 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0 2017 0–2 0.0% #516 1,445 0 0
28 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #998 1,436 0 0
30 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Shelby Rogers Anna Tatishvili
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
17 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2011 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 8 7 15 53.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 0 10 10 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 5 7 12 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2016 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9% — 19 51 70 27.1% 20 32 52 38.5% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's and 120/136 of Anna Tatishvili's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Shelby Rogers Anna Tatishvili
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 5/5 0.2 7.2 60.9% 52.1% 37.1% 52.3% 41.0% 46.6% 43.7%
17 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5% 2007 4/6 1.8 4.3 63.6% 55.3% 44.7% 41.1% 36.9% 51.3% 41.6%
18 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7% 2008 1/1 2.0 10.0 58.4% 53.8% 35.1% 40.0% 66.7% 46.1% 45.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 1.5 5.5 65.3% 52.8% 35.6% 45.0% 41.5% 46.4% 44.0%
20 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2% 2010 10/10 0.4 4.5 72.1% 54.8% 41.7% 48.4% 43.7% 51.0% 42.6%
21 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8% 2011 21/21 0.8 3.9 71.3% 54.6% 40.0% 36.7% 46.6% 50.4% 44.2%
22 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9% 2012 31/34 1.6 4.4 67.1% 57.4% 43.7% 48.3% 51.0% 52.5% 43.6%
23 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0% 2013 18/22 0.9 4.4 63.5% 48.7% 39.9% 44.9% 44.2% 45.5% 40.5%
24 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4% 2014 5/6 1.0 5.4 61.0% 55.4% 33.5% 45.4% 28.9% 47.3% 38.0%
25 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1% 2015 9/15 1.2 1.8 69.7% 59.4% 47.1% 49.3% 53.9% 56.0% 43.1%
26 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6% 2016 11/11 1.7 5.0 64.2% 61.3% 45.2% 54.1% 42.5% 54.8% 39.2%
27 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3% 2017 2/2 0.5 5.5 59.2% 55.0% 28.8% 41.7% 23.1% 43.1% 29.0%
28 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2% 2019 1/1 0.0 4.0 58.5% 33.3% 17.6% 14.3% 20.0% 26.8% 38.5%
30 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3% — 120/137 1.1 4.4 66.7% 55.2% 41.4% 45.7% 45.5% 50.4% 42.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Shelby Rogers Anna Tatishvili
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1486 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.05
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1503 107.1 -1.97 -1.16 0.819 45.5% +3 — — 33.3% -1.67 2–0 2–0 — -0.07
17 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10 2007 1457 98.2 -1.65 -2.40 0.853 46.6% +30 — — 26.7% -1.53 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.24
18 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08 2008 1445 99.5 +0.37 -0.11 0.846 45.9% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1423 97.5 -2.50 -0.92 0.822 45.3% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.08
20 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53 2010 1467 106.2 -2.74 -1.42 0.870 46.8% -3 +70 — 37.5% -1.13 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.24
21 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57 2011 1493 109.7 -3.47 +0.38 0.892 47.4% -31 +21 +123 37.3% -0.92 4–5 (44%) 2–0 — -0.54
22 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14 2012 1603 121.9 -2.57 -0.58 0.917 48.2% -29 -66 +25 48.6% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.7 +1.20
23 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44 2013 1492 109.8 -6.30 -0.93 0.743 43.1% -24 +61 — 27.5% -1.71 3–6 (33%) 0–6 (0%) 95.0 -1.42
24 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20 2014 1438 99.1 -2.75 -1.09 0.721 41.8% -11 — — 0.0% -3.17 — 0–1 — -0.11
25 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21 2015 1507 120.0 -1.39 +0.32 0.979 49.8% -24 +52 — 48.3% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.48
26 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20 2016 1465 99.1 -1.19 -1.79 0.868 47.1% -43 +61 +114 40.0% -1.12 1–4 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 97.3 +0.73
27 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47 2017 1445 96.1 -2.88 -0.25 0.510 37.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.07
28 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95 2019 1436 97.6 -1.44 +0.62 0.526 33.3% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.08
30 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71 — 1615 112.7 -3.01 -0.67 0.850 46.4% -21 +16 +80 36.5% -1.09 21–29 (42%) 15–17 (47%) 100.2 +0.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.