H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Shelby Rogers vs Anna Tatishvili H2H: 1-0
Shelby Rogers holds a 1–0 lead over Anna Tatishvili in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shelby Rogers leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2016 Acapulco third round 7-6(6) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2016* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Shelby Rogers | 7-6(6) 6-0 | Anna Tatishvili | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anna Tatishvili | #1,071 | #50 | 1,210 | 1,608 | 43 | 92 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shelby Rogers | Anna Tatishvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1156 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #302 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #285 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #134 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #51 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #127 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #101 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #200 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #516 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |