H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Shelby Rogers vs Chanelle Scheepers H2H: 0-1
Chanelle Scheepers holds a 1–0 lead over Shelby Rogers in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanelle Scheepers leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Chanelle Scheepers won the 2013 Strasbourg fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 42
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Chanelle Scheepers | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Shelby Rogers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shelby Rogers | #437 | #30 | 1,698 | 1,875 | 126 | 138 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chanelle Scheepers | #429 | #37 | 1,505 | 1,725 | 87 | 108 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Shelby Rogers | Chanelle Scheepers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #352 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #126 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2014 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #72 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2016 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2017 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #59 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #630 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #127 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #103 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #38 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2021 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #40 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2022 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #47 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #80 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #149 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #77 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #341 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #424 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |