H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Shuai Zhang vs Garbiñe Muguruza H2H: 1-3
Garbiñe Muguruza holds a 3–1 lead over Shuai Zhang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Garbiñe Muguruza leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Garbiñe Muguruza won the 2018 Zhuhai fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 32
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018* | Zhuhai | WTA Finals | R16 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 6-3 6-0 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Mar 26, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Garbiñe Muguruza | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Shuai Zhang | Match data |
| Feb 16, 2017* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Shuai Zhang | 7-6(3) 3-6 7-5 | Garbiñe Muguruza | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | #1,129 | #1 | 6,766 | 2,067 | 306 | 178 | 63.2% | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Garbiñe Muguruza | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #63 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #20 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #3 | 1,950 | 0 | 2 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #7 | 1,837 | 1 | 3 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #2 | 1,932 | 2 | 5 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #18 | 1,841 | 2 | 6 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #36 | 1,814 | 2 | 7 |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 23–8 | 74.2% | #15 | 1,933 | 2 | 7 |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #3 | 2,023 | 2 | 10 |
| 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #55 | 1,783 | 2 | 10 |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1081 | 1,729 | 2 | 10 |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |