H2H data updated: 2026-08-15 04:37 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Shuai Zhang vs Kayla Day.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Zhang | #62 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,857 | 228 | 290 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Kayla Day | #131 | #84 | 847 | 1,638 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Shuai Zhang | Kayla Day | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #150 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #87 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #23 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,732 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,631 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,733 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,526 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #62 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Shuai Zhang | Kayla Day | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | ||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 7 | 17 | 24 | 29.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 2013 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | 14 | 32 | 56.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 22 | 19 | 41 | 53.7% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 31.6% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 22 | 15 | 37 | 59.5% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 164 | 187 | 351 | 46.7% | 38 | 72 | 110 | 34.5% | 26 | 31 | 57 | 45.6% | Career | 7 | 19 | 26 | 26.9% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 493/522 of Shuai Zhang's and 37/38 of Kayla Day's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Shuai Zhang | Kayla Day | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% |
| 2007 | 1/3 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 55.8% | 62.1% | 39.1% | 42.9% | 100.0% | 51.9% | 22.7% | 2016 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 59.0% | 55.2% | 30.3% | 50.6% | 66.7% | 44.4% | 38.1% |
| 2008 | 6/6 | 0.8 | 3.2 | 68.8% | 53.0% | 45.1% | 47.6% | 38.3% | 50.3% | 38.5% | 2017 | 8/8 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 48.8% | 66.2% | 45.1% | 51.9% | 31.0% | 55.7% | 38.9% |
| 2009 | 2/3 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 65.6% | 47.9% | 49.0% | 39.4% | 37.9% | 48.5% | 42.7% | 2018 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 6.0 | 48.1% | 68.0% | 33.7% | 50.0% | 35.0% | 49.8% | 33.8% |
| 2010 | 6/7 | 0.2 | 5.3 | 72.2% | 51.8% | 31.0% | 48.7% | 46.7% | 46.1% | 42.2% | 2022 | 2/2 | 4.0 | 2.5 | 66.5% | 68.4% | 39.1% | 56.4% | 50.0% | 58.6% | 36.6% |
| 2011 | 28/30 | 0.6 | 2.5 | 69.3% | 54.9% | 39.3% | 47.4% | 41.5% | 50.2% | 39.4% | 2023 | 9/9 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 58.1% | 62.9% | 43.8% | 57.4% | 39.7% | 55.0% | 39.3% |
| 2012 | 8/8 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 64.8% | 56.8% | 35.6% | 43.8% | 44.0% | 49.6% | 41.2% | 2024 | 7/7 | 3.7 | 3.3 | 66.8% | 58.5% | 42.2% | 52.8% | 37.1% | 55.1% | 36.5% |
| 2013 | 11/13 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 64.9% | 68.1% | 47.0% | 62.4% | 49.6% | 60.4% | 48.0% | 2026 | 6/7 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 64.6% | 59.3% | 49.2% | 50.2% | 43.5% | 55.8% | 41.1% |
| 2014 | 38/42 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 68.5% | 57.4% | 45.2% | 51.5% | 49.8% | 53.8% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 14/16 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 66.9% | 60.1% | 45.8% | 51.2% | 59.4% | 55.0% | 42.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 38/46 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 66.2% | 58.7% | 48.2% | 49.5% | 56.1% | 55.2% | 45.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 46/47 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 63.5% | 65.3% | 44.1% | 53.1% | 50.1% | 57.6% | 44.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 55/55 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 63.7% | 63.6% | 46.9% | 52.4% | 47.8% | 57.3% | 43.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 41/41 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 62.7% | 62.5% | 44.0% | 51.7% | 47.7% | 55.7% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 22/22 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 67.4% | 61.9% | 48.0% | 48.9% | 50.6% | 57.2% | 43.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 39/39 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 64.7% | 59.8% | 43.1% | 53.0% | 43.0% | 54.0% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 58/60 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 65.7% | 64.3% | 48.1% | 45.8% | 47.7% | 58.8% | 42.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 22/22 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 61.1% | 57.6% | 39.6% | 41.4% | 52.3% | 50.6% | 37.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 17/17 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 64.9% | 61.4% | 43.5% | 45.0% | 40.9% | 55.0% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 15/18 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 67.0% | 60.0% | 39.9% | 39.2% | 47.8% | 53.4% | 45.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 26/27 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 68.7% | 59.9% | 47.8% | 56.2% | 42.5% | 56.0% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 493/523 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 65.5% | 60.9% | 44.8% | 49.9% | 48.1% | 55.3% | 42.3% | Career | 37/38 | 3.1 | 3.8 | 58.8% | 62.1% | 42.8% | 53.2% | 40.4% | 54.4% | 38.4% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Shuai Zhang | Kayla Day | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Schedule |
| 2006 | 1495 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | -0.16 | 2016 | 1541 | 108.1 | -2.89 | +0.53 | 0.685 | 42.0% | +16 | — | — | 0.0% | -4.75 | — | — | -0.22 |
| 2007 | 1464 | 103.0 | -1.60 | +0.26 | 0.473 | 38.5% | +16 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.67 | — | 0–1 | -0.03 | 2017 | 1526 | 111.1 | 0.00 | -2.26 | 0.877 | 47.2% | +12 | — | — | 45.0% | -0.85 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.27 |
| 2008 | 1413 | 101.8 | -1.83 | -2.28 | 0.775 | 44.3% | +21 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.21 | 0–2 | 0–2 | -0.03 | 2018 | 1488 | 90.9 | -2.88 | -2.16 | 0.673 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.20 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 |
| 2009 | 1468 | 120.7 | +2.65 | +2.50 | 0.830 | 45.6% | +21 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.33 | — | 1–0 | -0.05 | 2019 | 1463 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1492 | 103.6 | -3.51 | -1.21 | 0.783 | 44.3% | +26 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.19 | 2–0 | 1–1 | +0.43 | 2020 | 1450 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1445 | 108.6 | -4.27 | -3.16 | 0.790 | 44.9% | +24 | +34 | — | 30.8% | -1.57 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–6 (14%) | +0.04 | 2022 | 1535 | 99.4 | -0.92 | -1.75 | 0.884 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | +0.40 |
| 2012 | 1457 | 113.5 | -2.34 | +0.08 | 0.817 | 45.5% | +14 | — | — | 23.5% | -1.71 | 1–0 | 0–1 | -0.06 | 2023 | 1565 | 119.0 | -0.82 | -1.34 | 0.874 | 47.7% | -46 | +5 | — | 31.6% | -0.84 | 1–0 | 0–1 | +0.48 |
| 2013 | 1599 | 123.5 | +2.33 | +1.26 | 1.212 | 54.5% | -6 | — | — | 70.4% | +1.52 | 0–1 | 2–0 | +0.33 | 2024 | 1436 | 102.8 | -2.31 | -3.54 | 0.812 | 46.2% | -1 | +62 | — | 22.2% | -1.61 | 0–4 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | +0.80 |
| 2014 | 1601 | 117.2 | -1.75 | -0.53 | 0.931 | 48.5% | -53 | -64 | +34 | 42.9% | -0.46 | 10–6 (63%) | 4–4 (50%) | +0.53 | 2025 | 1481 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1519 | 110.7 | -2.05 | -0.11 | 0.952 | 48.8% | -21 | -6 | — | 33.3% | -0.83 | 0–4 (0%) | 0–3 (0%) | -0.66 | 2026 | 1638 | 132.1 | +0.10 | +0.13 | 0.931 | 48.6% | -14 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.86 | 1–1 | 1–1 | -0.59 |
| 2016 | 1743 | 135.8 | -0.56 | +2.30 | 1.016 | 50.3% | +22 | -249 | — | 50.6% | 0.00 | 8–1 (89%) | 5–6 (45%) | -0.28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1771 | 137.5 | +0.84 | +0.78 | 1.044 | 51.0% | +47 | -285 | -228 | 50.9% | +0.34 | 8–10 (44%) | 7–8 (47%) | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1727 | 132.0 | +0.70 | +0.72 | 1.025 | 50.7% | +24 | -167 | — | 52.4% | +0.02 | 5–9 (36%) | 9–8 (53%) | +2.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1682 | 131.6 | -0.65 | -1.22 | 0.946 | 49.1% | -16 | -99 | -23 | 47.7% | -0.17 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–1 (83%) | +0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 1732 | 132.0 | 0.00 | +0.35 | 1.003 | 50.0% | -60 | -38 | — | 52.0% | -0.06 | 4–2 (67%) | 5–3 (63%) | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1632 | 116.8 | -1.98 | -2.78 | 0.869 | 47.1% | -13 | -15 | +98 | 43.2% | -0.80 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–3 (63%) | +1.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 1734 | 139.5 | +1.61 | -0.45 | 1.023 | 50.4% | -6 | -141 | +122 | 53.4% | +0.09 | 6–2 (75%) | 11–8 (58%) | +0.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1526 | 112.3 | -4.75 | -4.14 | 0.755 | 43.8% | +90 | -29 | +195 | 28.3% | -1.61 | 1–5 (17%) | 1–2 (33%) | +0.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1576 | 131.2 | -0.87 | -2.36 | 0.873 | 47.3% | +48 | — | — | 35.1% | -1.08 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | -0.81 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 1732 | 134.6 | -2.26 | +1.21 | 0.975 | 49.2% | +28 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | 6–0 (100%) | 1–2 (33%) | -1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 1732 | 132.0 | -0.72 | -1.39 | 0.911 | 48.1% | +14 | -200 | +24 | 42.4% | -0.58 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–1 (80%) | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1858 | 134.1 | -0.74 | -0.56 | 0.946 | 48.9% | +10 | -114 | +38 | 45.4% | -0.38 | 62–66 (48%) | 64–61 (51%) | +0.55 | Career | 1638 | 116.5 | -1.06 | -1.63 | 0.842 | 46.6% | -7 | +29 | — | 29.8% | -1.39 | 3–9 (25%) | 2–6 (25%) | +2.11 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 5 | 2 | 7 | Feb 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 7 | 7 | Feb 20, 2024 | H2H |
| Johanna Konta | 1 | 6 | 7 | Aug 11, 2021 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 5, 2023 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Caroline Dolehide | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 3, 2024 | H2H |
| Marie Bouzkova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 12, 2023 | H2H |
| Garbiñe Muguruza | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 4, 2017 | H2H |
| Coco Gauff | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |