H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Sloane Stephens vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-3
Qiang Wang holds a 3–0 lead over Sloane Stephens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2021 Parma semifinal 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-2 7-6(3) | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Sep 26, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-2 6-2 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2016* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Sloane Stephens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | #315 | #3 | 5,727 | 1,970 | 298 | 240 | 55.4% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sloane Stephens | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #204 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #96 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #38 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #12 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 21–8 | 72.4% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #13 | 1,879 | 1 | 5 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #6 | 1,931 | 1 | 6 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #25 | 1,789 | 1 | 6 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #39 | 1,642 | 1 | 6 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #65 | 1,762 | 1 | 6 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #37 | 1,784 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #47 | 1,799 | 1 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #74 | 1,691 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,607 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #315 | 1,616 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |