H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Su-Wei Hsieh vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 0-3

Anett Kontaveit holds a 3–0 lead over Su-Wei Hsieh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2020 Brisbane International first round 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Su-Wei Hsieh
Chinese Taipei Age 40 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Anett Kontaveit
EST Age 30 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anett Kontaveit #26 6-4 6-1 Su-Wei Hsieh #33 Match data Jan 9, 2020* R32 Brisbane International Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Anett Kontaveit #19 3-6 6-2 7-5 Su-Wei Hsieh #27 Match data Mar 28, 2019* QF Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anett Kontaveit #98 6-1 6-3 Su-Wei Hsieh #112 Match data Sep 23, 2015* R32 Guangzhou Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Su-Wei Hsieh #909 #23 1,960 1,880 153 176 46.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Anett Kontaveit #81 #2 4,721 2,114 205 140 59.4% 0 0 0 3 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Anett Kontaveit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2001 5–2 71.4% #164 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2002 0–1 0.0% #267 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2013 0–1 0.0% #249 1,490 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2014 1–5 16.7% #159 1,465 0 0
19 2005 0–3 0.0% #142 1,506 0 0 2015 5–6 45.5% #91 1,517 0 0
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #129 1,462 0 0 2016 13–16 44.8% #112 1,606 0 0
21 2007 1–7 12.5% #157 1,419 0 0 2017 26–19 57.8% #34 1,706 0 1
22 2008 5–8 38.5% #81 1,483 0 0 2018 33–23 58.9% #20 1,837 0 1
23 2009 1–2 33.3% #314 1,473 0 0 2019 25–17 59.5% #26 1,875 0 1
24 2010 0–2 0.0% #362 1,454 0 0 2020 20–11 64.5% #23 1,870 0 1
25 2011 1–1 50.0% #172 1,458 0 0 2021 49–18 73.1% #7 2,058 0 5
26 2012 22–14 61.1% #25 1,672 0 2 2022 29–16 64.4% #17 1,886 0 6
27 2013 13–25 34.2% #86 1,554 0 2 2023 4–8 33.3% #81 1,779 0 6
28 2014 6–12 33.3% #141 1,542 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2015 6–5 54.5% #93 1,581 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2016 12–12 50.0% #87 1,586 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2017 8–15 34.8% #82 1,600 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2018 32–17 65.3% #28 1,778 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2019 31–24 56.4% #32 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2020 1–7 12.5% #67 1,706 0 3 — — — — — — —
35 2021 9–14 39.1% #108 1,686 0 3 — — — — — — —
37 2023 0–1 0.0% #713 1,658 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Anett Kontaveit
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2001 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2006 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5%
22 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 19 15 34 55.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2009 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2019 17 10 27 63.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 15 8 23 65.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
25 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 40 13 53 75.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2012 15 7 22 68.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2022 22 11 33 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2013 10 18 28 35.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2014 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 6 6 12 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 21 9 30 70.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 23 16 39 59.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 112 112 224 50.0% 21 37 58 36.2% 20 27 47 42.6% — 139 91 230 60.4% 46 33 79 58.2% 20 16 36 55.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 285/321 of Su-Wei Hsieh's and 327/346 of Anett Kontaveit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Anett Kontaveit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 1/1 1.0 6.0 60.7% 43.2% 37.5% 53.8% 100.0% 41.0% 34.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/6 1.0 4.0 60.9% 61.7% 40.9% 41.7% 44.7% 53.1% 43.9%
19 2005 1/3 0.0 1.0 68.9% 45.2% 28.6% 44.4% 0.0% 40.0% 31.9% 2015 5/11 2.6 3.4 57.9% 51.5% 44.8% 28.1% 34.6% 48.4% 40.1%
20 2006 2/4 0.0 1.5 70.8% 54.2% 53.1% 56.9% 10.7% 53.2% 36.5% 2016 29/30 4.3 4.8 58.9% 66.1% 45.4% 54.5% 51.5% 57.6% 42.4%
21 2007 3/8 0.3 3.0 58.2% 61.7% 45.8% 57.9% 26.5% 55.0% 34.9% 2017 45/45 3.2 3.8 64.0% 68.8% 48.4% 54.2% 44.0% 61.4% 44.3%
22 2008 11/13 1.1 3.7 53.2% 62.4% 43.3% 51.4% 38.7% 53.6% 42.4% 2018 55/56 3.1 3.8 62.3% 63.8% 46.6% 57.8% 51.1% 57.4% 44.9%
23 2009 3/3 0.3 3.7 58.9% 51.8% 46.8% 29.4% 52.6% 49.8% 48.1% 2019 38/42 3.5 2.6 63.1% 66.8% 48.3% 61.3% 45.3% 59.5% 43.2%
24 2010 2/2 0.5 4.0 60.9% 63.3% 38.7% 52.2% 46.3% 53.7% 43.8% 2020 31/31 3.5 2.3 62.2% 67.6% 48.2% 53.1% 53.1% 60.2% 45.4%
25 2011 2/2 0.0 2.5 62.8% 59.0% 52.3% 72.4% 57.5% 56.4% 54.5% 2021 61/67 3.6 2.6 60.7% 69.7% 50.2% 56.4% 53.2% 62.2% 45.8%
26 2012 29/36 0.6 2.5 64.5% 63.4% 48.2% 50.2% 45.6% 58.1% 47.7% 2022 45/45 2.9 2.8 63.2% 66.5% 47.4% 54.5% 47.5% 59.6% 44.4%
27 2013 33/38 0.7 3.0 62.9% 54.8% 42.6% 45.6% 49.0% 50.2% 43.3% 2023 12/12 2.9 3.1 62.4% 64.4% 43.0% 46.1% 37.2% 56.3% 40.1%
28 2014 14/18 0.9 2.6 61.9% 54.6% 40.0% 41.3% 41.6% 49.3% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 7/11 2.1 2.9 61.0% 61.1% 53.7% 55.2% 49.1% 58.2% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 24/24 1.1 2.6 58.5% 61.5% 47.9% 48.7% 43.8% 55.8% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 23/23 1.1 2.7 63.4% 56.9% 39.7% 45.0% 49.8% 50.5% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 46/49 0.8 3.1 63.3% 60.9% 47.5% 57.5% 54.0% 56.0% 47.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 53/55 0.7 3.2 64.4% 61.9% 46.6% 51.7% 47.6% 56.5% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 8/8 0.1 3.0 61.2% 53.2% 42.9% 42.4% 53.9% 48.9% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 23/23 0.7 3.1 64.0% 55.2% 43.8% 49.8% 41.6% 51.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1/1 1.0 2.0 64.9% 60.0% 44.4% 16.7% 45.5% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 285/329 0.8 2.9 62.6% 59.3% 45.3% 50.0% 47.0% 54.1% 44.5% — 327/346 3.3 3.2 62.0% 66.6% 47.6% 55.1% 48.9% 59.4% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Su-Wei Hsieh Anett Kontaveit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2001 1548 108.6 — — — — +31 — — 63.2% +1.00 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +1.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2002 1541 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1491 98.3 -2.83 -0.54 0.580 38.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1466 100.3 -0.85 +0.51 0.936 48.5% — +74 — 28.6% -1.21 0–2 1–1 — -0.11
19 2005 1506 99.1 -0.87 -2.03 0.532 35.9% +18 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — -0.18 2015 1517 109.4 -3.04 -1.00 0.776 44.4% +23 — — 45.8% -0.63 1–1 0–1 — +0.14
20 2006 1462 97.2 -0.43 -2.06 0.780 45.6% — — — 11.1% -2.11 0–1 — — +0.03 2016 1607 127.5 +1.62 -0.14 1.002 50.4% -2 -120 -30 50.0% +0.26 3–7 (30%) 3–7 (30%) 93.8 -2.22
21 2007 1419 94.3 -0.52 -2.42 0.776 45.0% +29 — — 22.2% -2.00 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 2017 1706 137.6 +4.48 +1.12 1.147 52.5% -91 +30 +30 56.2% +0.75 8–7 (53%) 7–9 (44%) 101.7 -0.81
22 2008 1483 115.6 -0.18 -0.54 0.915 47.9% +35 -31 — 40.0% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.39 2018 1837 141.9 +0.78 +2.24 1.053 51.3% -76 +49 -138 53.4% +0.30 15–8 (65%) 10–5 (67%) 110.5 +1.22
23 2009 1473 99.4 -1.34 -1.35 0.959 48.9% +30 — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.39 2019 1876 145.7 +2.85 +1.08 1.066 51.5% +36 -18 -176 51.8% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 -0.95
24 2010 1454 101.1 -0.49 +0.07 0.946 48.5% — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–2 — -0.03 2020 1871 153.1 +2.99 +1.93 1.143 52.9% +44 -8 — 61.6% +1.01 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 99.9 +0.31
25 2011 1459 105.4 -0.05 -0.94 1.250 55.5% — — — 60.0% +1.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 2021 2058 162.0 +5.54 +3.36 1.211 54.0% +27 -175 -286 69.2% +1.24 10–7 (59%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 -1.91
26 2012 1672 133.4 +1.38 +2.74 1.138 52.7% -4 -182 -35 58.2% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.4 +0.40 2022 1886 151.2 +2.51 +1.53 1.100 52.0% +86 +5 — 61.2% +0.68 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.1 +0.40
27 2013 1554 116.0 -3.73 +0.15 0.871 46.8% +4 -81 +19 37.6% -1.02 3–6 (33%) 5–7 (42%) 97.2 -0.23 2023 1779 114.3 -0.99 -1.11 0.919 48.2% +118 +17 — 40.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.10
28 2014 1542 107.7 -3.95 -1.33 0.834 45.9% +33 — — 35.7% -1.24 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.6 +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 1582 111.2 -0.41 -0.09 0.996 50.3% +31 — — 48.1% +0.04 4–1 (80%) 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2016 1586 119.0 -0.64 +0.61 0.979 49.4% -1 -70 -44 47.4% -0.11 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 103.6 -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2017 1601 109.3 -4.02 +0.80 0.895 47.4% -15 -59 -29 37.0% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 1778 132.6 -0.63 +4.07 1.073 51.5% -22 -182 -83 58.2% +0.56 12–6 (67%) 5–4 (56%) 108.9 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1781 146.5 +0.12 +2.75 1.033 50.7% +29 -185 -15 52.6% +0.24 16–9 (64%) 10–8 (56%) 107.5 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1707 118.1 -2.64 +0.13 0.796 44.9% +27 -121 — 17.6% -2.35 0–1 1–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1687 126.8 -2.62 -0.02 0.895 47.4% +64 -177 — 43.1% -0.80 3–4 (43%) 4–0 (100%) — -1.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2023 1658 96.7 -0.52 -0.38 1.002 49.4% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2024 1628 102.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1881 128.6 -1.28 +1.43 0.970 49.3% +14 -131 -34 46.0% -0.30 63–56 (53%) 39–44 (47%) 103.9 -0.68 — 2114 150.2 +2.78 +1.61 1.089 51.8% +11 -6 -112 56.8% +0.53 61–49 (55%) 42–39 (52%) 103.2 -1.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.