H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Timea Babos vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0

Timea Babos holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Timea Babos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2015 Shenzhen round of 32 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Timea Babos #96 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 Qiang Wang #101 Match data Jan 8, 2015* R32 Shenzhen International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Timea Babos Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
31 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Timea Babos Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/304 of Timea Babos's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Timea Babos Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
31 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Timea Babos Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
31 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.