H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Yaroslava Shvedova vs Valeria Savinykh H2H: 1-0
Yaroslava Shvedova holds a 1–0 lead over Valeria Savinykh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yaroslava Shvedova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yaroslava Shvedova won the 2012 Bogota fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2012* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Yaroslava Shvedova | 6-2 6-2 | Valeria Savinykh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yaroslava Shvedova | #1,136 | #25 | 1,860 | 1,751 | 141 | 175 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Valeria Savinykh | #490 | #99 | 680 | 1,546 | 10 | 21 | 32.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yaroslava Shvedova | Valeria Savinykh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #292 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,492 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #92 | 1,470 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #231 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #204 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #65 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #289 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,345 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #434 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |