H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 3-1
Yulia Putintseva holds a 3–1 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alison Van Uytvanck won the 2021 Nur-Sultan final 1-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2021 | Nur-Sultan | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Alison Van Uytvanck | 1-6 6-4 6-3 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2021* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-0 2-6 6-2 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| May 23, 2013* | Brussels | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 6-1 6-0 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |