H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Yulia Putintseva vs Sabine Lisicki H2H: 3-0
Yulia Putintseva holds a 3–0 lead over Sabine Lisicki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yulia Putintseva leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yulia Putintseva won the 2018 Guangzhou fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 36
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-3 6-3 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Yulia Putintseva | 6-1 6-2 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
| Apr 7, 2016* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Yulia Putintseva | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Sabine Lisicki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Sabine Lisicki | #502 | #12 | 3,251 | 1,940 | 206 | 172 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Yulia Putintseva | Sabine Lisicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #444 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #57 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #22 | 1,792 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #175 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 35–13 | 72.9% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #37 | 1,707 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,824 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #32 | 1,791 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #93 | 1,647 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #220 | 1,636 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #199 | 1,549 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #562 | 1,479 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #342 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,569 | 0 | 4 |