H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ajla Tomljanovic vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2019 Beijing second round 7-5 5-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 5-4 | Ajla Tomljanovic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajla Tomljanovic | #92 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,917 | 191 | 224 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ajla Tomljanovic | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #493 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #63 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #929 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #46 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #51 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #45 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,867 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #290 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #109 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #80 | 1,766 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #92 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |