H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ajla Tomljanovic vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1

Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Ajla Tomljanovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2019 China Open first round 7-5 5-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ajla Tomljanovic
Australia Age 33 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #16 7-5 5-4 Ajla Tomljanovic #49 Match data Sep 29, 2019 R64 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ajla Tomljanovic #103 #32 1,490 1,919 192 227 45.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2009 0–1 0.0% #301 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2010 1–3 25.0% #164 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2011 1–5 16.7% #149 1,435 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2012 0–1 0.0% #493 1,420 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2013 7–7 50.0% #73 1,523 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2014 17–20 45.9% #63 1,587 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2015 18–21 46.2% #65 1,604 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2016 0–2 0.0% #929 1,581 0 0 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2017 5–10 33.3% #136 1,571 0 0 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2018 22–19 53.7% #46 1,713 0 0 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2019 25–29 46.3% #51 1,653 0 0 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2020 5–11 31.2% #68 1,615 0 0 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2021 24–22 52.2% #45 1,778 0 0 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2022 28–24 53.8% #33 1,867 0 0 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2023 1–2 33.3% #290 1,847 0 0 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
31 2024 9–15 37.5% #109 1,791 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2025 17–22 43.6% #80 1,768 0 0 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2
33 2026 12–13 48.0% #103 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2014 11 13 24 45.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2017 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2019 14 18 32 43.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2020 5 8 13 38.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2021 13 14 27 48.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2022 14 15 29 48.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 7 3 10 70.0% 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 2023 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2024 4 10 14 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 11 14 25 44.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2026 8 5 13 61.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 118 142 260 45.4% 45 57 102 44.1% 29 28 57 50.9% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 388/420 of Ajla Tomljanovic's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2009 1/1 1.0 7.0 58.7% 61.4% 35.5% 50.0% 66.7% 50.7% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 4/4 2.5 4.3 56.4% 63.8% 45.0% 54.7% 49.3% 55.4% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 6/6 3.0 4.7 56.9% 62.3% 39.8% 53.5% 54.9% 52.7% 48.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1/1 0.0 8.0 54.2% 53.8% 27.3% 25.0% 44.4% 41.7% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 11/14 4.5 4.5 56.5% 64.4% 45.5% 54.6% 49.4% 56.3% 44.4% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2014 32/37 4.2 4.3 56.7% 68.6% 43.3% 54.3% 46.9% 57.7% 41.4% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2015 33/39 4.1 4.3 62.9% 64.1% 48.0% 47.9% 47.0% 58.1% 39.9% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2016 2/2 2.0 5.0 54.1% 51.0% 30.3% 57.2% 70.8% 41.5% 43.0% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2017 15/15 2.1 5.7 58.1% 61.2% 36.9% 45.7% 39.5% 50.7% 41.8% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2018 41/41 3.4 4.9 58.4% 64.1% 43.8% 46.4% 51.9% 55.6% 44.1% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2019 53/54 3.5 4.3 57.9% 66.8% 41.5% 49.1% 46.9% 56.3% 44.0% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2020 16/16 3.3 4.3 55.0% 64.8% 46.2% 48.0% 40.7% 56.3% 40.8% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2021 44/46 2.5 4.0 61.8% 64.4% 45.8% 55.9% 46.4% 57.2% 43.6% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2022 52/52 2.6 4.2 62.5% 64.6% 43.8% 48.1% 52.0% 56.8% 44.1% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2023 2/3 3.0 5.0 65.3% 62.9% 47.1% 43.8% 48.0% 57.5% 43.1% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
31 2024 22/24 2.9 7.5 64.1% 62.8% 38.0% 50.7% 40.5% 53.9% 42.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 28/39 2.2 5.6 65.8% 61.9% 42.1% 49.1% 51.2% 55.2% 43.4% 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
33 2026 25/26 1.9 5.7 67.2% 63.3% 44.0% 54.1% 53.1% 56.9% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 388/420 3.0 4.8 60.7% 64.4% 43.3% 50.2% 48.3% 56.1% 43.1% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ajla Tomljanovic Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2009 1484 97.7 -3.11 -1.39 0.579 41.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2010 1465 98.9 -2.42 -2.23 0.863 47.3% +22 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2011 1436 104.6 -1.59 +0.58 1.019 50.4% +18 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–4 (0%) 0–2 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2012 1421 96.4 -2.81 -3.22 0.731 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2013 1524 117.9 -0.54 -0.01 1.015 50.1% +16 — +14 50.0% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 3–0 (100%) — 0.00 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2014 1588 121.5 +0.93 -1.84 0.978 49.5% -16 +10 — 48.2% -0.12 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 102.5 +0.94 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2015 1605 119.3 -0.59 -1.44 0.953 49.0% -12 +8 -87 45.1% -0.46 8–5 (62%) 12–3 (80%) 109.7 +0.57 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2016 1581 102.8 -1.21 +0.88 0.734 42.1% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.07 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2017 1571 112.5 -3.75 +0.50 0.848 46.2% +16 -10 — 42.4% -0.94 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.62 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2018 1714 128.3 -0.28 +0.61 0.992 49.8% -20 -131 -150 51.0% +0.03 12–8 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 103.1 -0.62 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2019 1654 138.3 -0.07 +1.07 1.005 50.1% +8 -20 -47 50.0% +0.06 6–12 (33%) 6–11 (35%) 94.0 -0.88 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2020 1615 130.7 +0.18 -1.12 0.935 48.5% +33 -43 — 36.8% -0.79 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 99.6 -0.53 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2021 1779 141.3 +0.91 +0.76 1.019 50.3% -67 -93 -32 52.0% +0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 103.3 -0.37 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2022 1867 144.0 +0.10 +1.33 1.021 50.4% -31 -149 -23 53.0% +0.16 10–9 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 101.7 -1.02 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2023 1848 99.8 -0.66 +1.44 1.016 50.2% -57 — — 40.0% 0.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.22 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
31 2024 1792 122.8 -1.50 -0.80 0.920 48.1% -16 -35 +106 41.1% -0.71 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 98.2 -0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2025 1769 134.0 -0.96 +0.30 0.968 49.2% -15 -12 +78 46.2% -0.34 8–9 (47%) 9–1 (90%) 104.4 -0.95 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
33 2026 1715 134.5 -0.15 +1.20 1.055 51.2% +100 -103 +129 50.0% +0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1919 136.5 -0.29 +0.21 0.982 49.6% -8 -55 -5 47.6% -0.20 75–88 (46%) 63–57 (53%) 103.1 -0.82 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.