H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Aliaksandra Sasnovich vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Aliaksandra Sasnovich in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2020 Shenzhen fourth round 6-4 0-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2024 | Tokyo | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 7-6(4) 6-0 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2020* | Shenzhen | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-4 0-6 7-6(5) | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |