H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Amanda Anisimova holds a 3–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Amanda Anisimova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Amanda Anisimova won the 2021 Italian Open first round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | 7-5 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data | May 12, 2021* | R64 | Italian Open | WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Amanda Anisimova | 6-2 7-5 | Qiang Wang | Match data | Aug 2, 2018* | R32 | San Jose | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Amanda Anisimova | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Qiang Wang | Match data | Mar 22, 2018* | R128 | Miami Open | Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amanda Anisimova | #10 | #4 | 6,680 | 2,125 | 179 | 107 | 62.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,931 | 129 | 127 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #96 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #24 | 1,765 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #30 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #78 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #23 | 1,927 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #369 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,892 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,114 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #10 | 2,011 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2024 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2025 | 27 | 10 | 37 | 73.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 2015 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 18 | 9 | 27 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2016 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 18 | 13 | 31 | 58.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 32 | 15 | 47 | 68.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 112 | 70 | 182 | 61.5% | 41 | 25 | 66 | 62.1% | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | — | 103 | 89 | 192 | 53.6% | 21 | 27 | 48 | 43.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 258/290 of Amanda Anisimova's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 15 | 2017 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 56.5% | 58.9% | 38.9% | 56.1% | 46.1% | 50.4% | 45.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 16/17 | 0.9 | 3.0 | 67.0% | 66.6% | 51.5% | 59.8% | 49.3% | 61.5% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 35/36 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 65.4% | 63.1% | 48.2% | 61.3% | 48.8% | 57.6% | 47.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 20/21 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 66.6% | 60.7% | 45.3% | 46.4% | 44.0% | 55.2% | 43.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 29/29 | 2.2 | 3.1 | 66.0% | 65.3% | 47.5% | 50.6% | 54.4% | 59.4% | 46.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 44/47 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 65.6% | 66.5% | 48.7% | 52.8% | 50.6% | 60.3% | 44.5% | 2012 | 3/3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 63.7% | 51.1% | 37.0% | 33.2% | 54.2% | 46.3% | 37.9% |
| 21 | 2023 | 9/9 | 1.8 | 4.1 | 65.2% | 61.7% | 44.6% | 47.8% | 42.5% | 55.7% | 40.9% | 2013 | 1/2 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 69.4% | 59.3% | 57.7% | 37.5% | 26.3% | 58.8% | 47.6% |
| 22 | 2024 | 28/29 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 61.6% | 61.3% | 49.1% | 55.4% | 53.8% | 56.5% | 44.0% | 2014 | 2/3 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 56.4% | 70.6% | 54.4% | 81.8% | 42.4% | 62.7% | 49.1% |
| 23 | 2025 | 44/64 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 63.1% | 67.4% | 49.9% | 56.3% | 47.4% | 61.1% | 44.5% | 2015 | 10/18 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 64.1% | 59.0% | 45.4% | 48.0% | 33.2% | 53.6% | 37.0% |
| 24 | 2026 | 31/36 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 68.9% | 50.4% | 47.4% | 54.2% | 62.3% | 47.2% | 2016 | 18/22 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 63.0% | 62.4% | 44.4% | 53.3% | 46.6% | 55.9% | 41.6% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 43/43 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 63.1% | 63.9% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 49.0% | 58.9% | 46.3% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 57/58 | 2.6 | 1.7 | 62.4% | 65.2% | 48.8% | 52.5% | 49.8% | 59.1% | 47.4% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40/41 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 61.7% | 63.9% | 49.5% | 56.1% | 52.1% | 58.0% | 43.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 13/13 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 60.2% | 63.2% | 53.7% | 51.1% | 44.2% | 59.4% | 43.6% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 22/24 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 58.5% | 60.7% | 44.5% | 53.9% | 39.5% | 53.9% | 43.9% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26/26 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 63.8% | 61.7% | 47.7% | 53.8% | 50.2% | 56.6% | 42.6% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4/4 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 61.2% | 54.3% | 27.9% | 38.6% | 51.4% | 45.2% | 36.5% |
| Career | — | 258/290 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 64.6% | 65.1% | 48.7% | 53.7% | 50.1% | 59.2% | 45.3% | — | 239/257 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 62.2% | 63.0% | 48.1% | 53.5% | 47.8% | 57.3% | 44.4% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Amanda Anisimova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 2017 | 1483 | 101.2 | -0.25 | -2.07 | 0.921 | 48.2% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.67 | 0–2 | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2018 | 1683 | 142.2 | +4.05 | +2.84 | 1.199 | 54.1% | +12 | — | — | 68.6% | +1.34 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2019 | 1765 | 138.6 | +0.98 | +4.05 | 1.126 | 52.6% | -48 | -32 | -110 | 63.0% | +0.84 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–1 (86%) | 104.3 | +0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2020 | 1778 | 138.0 | -0.33 | +0.69 | 0.973 | 49.5% | -19 | -30 | — | 55.6% | +0.18 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.4 | -0.42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 1780 | 139.7 | +2.46 | +2.91 | 1.136 | 52.6% | +8 | -45 | -146 | 51.5% | +0.55 | 2–8 (20%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.9 | -1.37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1927 | 151.1 | +2.94 | +2.37 | 1.120 | 52.3% | -73 | -6 | -126 | 65.1% | +0.87 | 13–5 (72%) | 5–2 (71%) | 110.1 | -2.09 | 2012 | 1459 | 93.4 | -2.59 | -4.30 | 0.705 | 42.2% | +20 | — | — | 14.3% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.34 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1794 | 127.1 | -0.58 | -0.40 | 0.923 | 48.2% | -29 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.26 | 2013 | 1474 | 106.8 | +1.03 | +1.18 | 1.155 | 52.7% | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | -0.12 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1892 | 146.4 | +0.57 | +1.45 | 1.010 | 50.3% | +36 | -108 | — | 62.3% | +0.41 | 3–6 (33%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.8 | -1.57 | 2014 | 1468 | 102.3 | -0.40 | -0.04 | 1.315 | 56.2% | +13 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.36 |
| 23 | 2025 | 2115 | 162.2 | +3.85 | +2.19 | 1.142 | 52.6% | +10 | -238 | -59 | 66.7% | +1.09 | 15–4 (79%) | 9–5 (64%) | 113.5 | -0.29 | 2015 | 1449 | 112.8 | -2.12 | -2.78 | 0.797 | 45.2% | +43 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.18 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 2026 | 2012 | 157.7 | +4.35 | +4.19 | 1.250 | 54.7% | +43 | -142 | +2 | 60.8% | +1.05 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.9 | +1.28 | 2016 | 1539 | 124.4 | +0.50 | 0.00 | 0.943 | 48.8% | +23 | -27 | — | 43.5% | -0.56 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–0 | — | -0.52 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1721 | 140.3 | +2.20 | +2.13 | 1.126 | 52.2% | +4 | -118 | — | 57.4% | +0.51 | 5–10 (33%) | 5–4 (56%) | 97.5 | -0.59 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1906 | 152.9 | +2.58 | +4.18 | 1.157 | 53.0% | +14 | -273 | — | 61.1% | +1.10 | 9–5 (64%) | 1–3 (25%) | 102.8 | -1.43 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1793 | 132.7 | +1.42 | +0.89 | 1.038 | 50.7% | +55 | -204 | -179 | 55.6% | +0.16 | 4–6 (40%) | 6–2 (75%) | 101.2 | +1.10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1766 | 129.1 | +2.56 | +1.23 | 1.073 | 51.4% | +32 | — | — | 53.3% | +0.03 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 98.7 | +0.36 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1714 | 121.2 | -1.69 | +0.38 | 0.952 | 48.9% | -23 | -55 | — | 44.1% | -0.42 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–1 (75%) | 100.4 | +0.25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1717 | 128.6 | +0.18 | +0.03 | 0.981 | 49.6% | +35 | — | -160 | 45.2% | -0.11 | 8–2 (80%) | 2–8 (20%) | 101.7 | -0.05 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1624 | 97.7 | -3.97 | -0.81 | 0.667 | 41.0% | +19 | — | — | 11.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.38 |
| Career | — | 2126 | 156.9 | +2.36 | +2.51 | 1.111 | 52.2% | -1 | -68 | -83 | 61.2% | +0.77 | 49–44 (53%) | 32–25 (56%) | 106.2 | -1.30 | — | 1931 | 138.9 | +1.10 | +1.45 | 1.038 | 50.7% | +22 | -151 | -171 | 50.5% | +0.07 | 38–44 (46%) | 22–21 (51%) | 100.4 | -0.15 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 6 | 5 | 11 | Nov 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 1 | 6 | 7 | Feb 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 0 | 6 | 6 | Aug 20, 2026 | H2H |
| Elina Svitolina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Belinda Bencic | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 24, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 22, 2022 | H2H |
| Daria Kasatkina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Jan 8, 2021 | H2H |
| Fiona Ferro | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jan 23, 2020 | H2H |
| Su-Wei Hsieh | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Mar 9, 2021 | H2H |