H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andreea Mitu vs Agnieszka Radwanska H2H: 0-1
Agnieszka Radwanska holds a 1–0 lead over Andreea Mitu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Agnieszka Radwanska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Agnieszka Radwanska won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Agnieszka Radwanska | 6-2 6-1 | Andreea Mitu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreea Mitu | #537 | #68 | 820 | 1,551 | 11 | 26 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | #74 | #2 | 8,530 | 2,081 | 506 | 237 | 68.1% | 0 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andreea Mitu | Agnieszka Radwanska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #61 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,808 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,926 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #10 | 1,910 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #14 | 1,860 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #8 | 1,979 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 59–19 | 75.6% | #4 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #212 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 43–22 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,872 | 0 | 14 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 50–22 | 69.4% | #5 | 1,957 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #3 | 1,942 | 0 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #537 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |