H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anett Kontaveit vs Shelby Rogers H2H: 1-2

Shelby Rogers holds a 2–1 lead over Anett Kontaveit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Shelby Rogers leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Anett Kontaveit leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Shelby Rogers won the 2023 Abu Dhabi Open second round 4-6 6-3 4-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anett Kontaveit
EST Age 30 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Shelby Rogers
United States Age 33 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shelby Rogers #46 4-6 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Anett Kontaveit #18 Match data Feb 10, 2023* R16 Abu Dhabi Open WTA 500 Hard
Shelby Rogers #57 6-4 6-3 Anett Kontaveit #22 Match data Feb 13, 2021* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Anett Kontaveit #20 6-0 3-6 6-4 Shelby Rogers #298 Match data Jul 3, 2019* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anett Kontaveit #81 #2 4,721 2,114 205 140 59.4% 0 0 0 3 3 6
Shelby Rogers #437 #30 1,698 1,855 126 140 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anett Kontaveit Shelby Rogers
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2013 0–1 0.0% #249 1,490 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #352 1,494 0 0
18 2014 1–5 16.7% #159 1,465 0 0 2011 0–1 0.0% #426 1,479 0 0
19 2015 5–6 45.5% #91 1,517 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2016 13–16 44.8% #112 1,606 0 0 2013 2–3 40.0% #126 1,478 0 0
21 2017 26–19 57.8% #34 1,706 0 1 2014 12–9 57.1% #72 1,630 0 0
22 2018 33–23 58.9% #20 1,837 0 1 2015 4–14 22.2% #151 1,527 0 0
23 2019 25–17 59.5% #26 1,875 0 1 2016 13–15 46.4% #59 1,585 0 0
24 2020 20–11 64.5% #23 1,870 0 1 2017 23–19 54.8% #59 1,689 0 0
25 2021 49–18 73.1% #7 2,058 0 5 2018 0–2 0.0% #630 1,650 0 0
26 2022 29–16 64.4% #17 1,886 0 6 2019 3–9 25.0% #177 1,574 0 0
27 2023 4–8 33.3% #81 1,779 0 6 2020 8–6 57.1% #60 1,679 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2021 28–21 57.1% #40 1,804 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2022 20–19 51.3% #47 1,804 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2023 9–13 40.9% #149 1,773 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2024 4–8 33.3% #341 1,675 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anett Kontaveit Shelby Rogers
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2017 9 13 22 40.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 2014 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
22 2018 19 15 34 55.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 2 8 10 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2019 17 10 27 63.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 5 10 15 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2020 15 8 23 65.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2017 13 12 25 52.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2021 40 13 53 75.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2018 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2022 22 11 33 66.7% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2020 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 20 12 32 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 14 11 25 56.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 6 7 13 46.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
Career — 139 91 230 60.4% 46 33 79 58.2% 20 16 36 55.6% — 77 82 159 48.4% 38 40 78 48.7% 11 18 29 37.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 327/346 of Anett Kontaveit's and 252/266 of Shelby Rogers's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anett Kontaveit Shelby Rogers
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2013 1/1 1.0 6.0 60.7% 43.2% 37.5% 53.8% 100.0% 41.0% 34.2% 2010 1/1 2.0 9.0 49.2% 68.9% 41.3% 60.0% 60.0% 54.8% 35.5%
18 2014 5/6 1.0 4.0 60.9% 61.7% 40.9% 41.7% 44.7% 53.1% 43.9% 2011 1/1 3.0 4.0 51.7% 54.8% 51.7% 37.5% 22.2% 53.3% 36.7%
19 2015 5/11 2.6 3.4 57.9% 51.5% 44.8% 28.1% 34.6% 48.4% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 29/30 4.3 4.8 58.9% 66.1% 45.4% 54.5% 51.5% 57.6% 42.4% 2013 3/5 4.0 1.3 62.8% 67.6% 53.3% 59.4% 27.8% 62.3% 34.2%
21 2017 45/45 3.2 3.8 64.0% 68.8% 48.4% 54.2% 44.0% 61.4% 44.3% 2014 20/21 3.3 3.5 59.4% 66.1% 43.5% 47.9% 39.3% 57.1% 42.8%
22 2018 55/56 3.1 3.8 62.3% 63.8% 46.6% 57.8% 51.1% 57.4% 44.9% 2015 13/18 1.8 4.1 61.1% 58.1% 48.5% 48.5% 41.6% 54.1% 35.9%
23 2019 38/42 3.5 2.6 63.1% 66.8% 48.3% 61.3% 45.3% 59.5% 43.2% 2016 25/28 3.5 3.0 59.2% 65.0% 50.8% 53.1% 54.6% 59.3% 43.0%
24 2020 31/31 3.5 2.3 62.2% 67.6% 48.2% 53.1% 53.1% 60.2% 45.4% 2017 40/42 3.4 2.5 61.9% 65.3% 49.1% 54.4% 51.6% 59.1% 41.4%
25 2021 61/67 3.6 2.6 60.7% 69.7% 50.2% 56.4% 53.2% 62.2% 45.8% 2018 2/2 5.0 5.0 57.9% 60.1% 48.5% 36.8% 57.7% 55.1% 40.1%
26 2022 45/45 2.9 2.8 63.2% 66.5% 47.4% 54.5% 47.5% 59.6% 44.4% 2019 12/12 4.9 3.4 58.6% 62.2% 47.5% 50.8% 52.1% 56.2% 43.6%
27 2023 12/12 2.9 3.1 62.4% 64.4% 43.0% 46.1% 37.2% 56.3% 40.1% 2020 14/14 4.2 2.6 60.1% 67.3% 48.7% 55.8% 53.6% 59.4% 39.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 49/49 4.0 2.4 62.3% 67.1% 50.2% 54.5% 49.2% 60.6% 43.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 38/39 4.3 3.0 60.1% 67.1% 49.9% 58.3% 49.5% 60.2% 40.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 22/22 3.7 2.9 60.1% 68.2% 45.8% 55.2% 50.0% 59.0% 39.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 12/12 2.2 2.3 58.0% 64.8% 47.7% 51.0% 41.6% 57.3% 40.4%
Career — 327/346 3.3 3.2 62.0% 66.6% 47.6% 55.1% 48.9% 59.4% 44.2% — 252/266 3.7 2.9 60.5% 65.7% 48.7% 53.7% 48.8% 58.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anett Kontaveit Shelby Rogers
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1491 98.3 -2.83 -0.54 0.580 38.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.08 2010 1494 105.0 +0.17 +0.58 0.785 45.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 2014 1466 100.3 -0.85 +0.51 0.936 48.5% — +74 — 28.6% -1.21 0–2 1–1 — -0.11 2011 1479 95.8 -4.03 -4.58 0.787 43.9% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.08
19 2015 1517 109.4 -3.04 -1.00 0.776 44.4% +23 — — 45.8% -0.63 1–1 0–1 — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2016 1607 127.5 +1.62 -0.14 1.002 50.4% -2 -120 -30 50.0% +0.26 3–7 (30%) 3–7 (30%) 93.8 -2.22 2013 1478 105.2 +0.56 -2.93 0.907 49.1% — +62 — 50.0% +0.17 0–2 — — +0.53
21 2017 1706 137.6 +4.48 +1.12 1.147 52.5% -91 +30 +30 56.2% +0.75 8–7 (53%) 7–9 (44%) 101.7 -0.81 2014 1631 132.2 +1.08 -0.03 0.997 49.8% -30 -7 — 53.2% +0.15 4–1 (80%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 -0.57
22 2018 1837 141.9 +0.78 +2.24 1.053 51.3% -76 +49 -138 53.4% +0.30 15–8 (65%) 10–5 (67%) 110.5 +1.22 2015 1528 107.8 -2.17 -3.76 0.783 44.7% +11 +55 — 28.2% -1.67 0–3 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 92.8 -0.14
23 2019 1876 145.7 +2.85 +1.08 1.066 51.5% +36 -18 -176 51.8% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 -0.95 2016 1585 127.2 +2.25 +0.12 1.057 51.1% -39 +110 — 49.3% +0.09 5–8 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 97.4 +0.44
24 2020 1871 153.1 +2.99 +1.93 1.143 52.9% +44 -8 — 61.6% +1.01 6–5 (55%) 4–2 (67%) 99.9 +0.31 2017 1689 133.0 +2.26 -1.35 1.011 50.1% -50 +54 -96 52.0% +0.14 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 108.3 -1.20
25 2021 2058 162.0 +5.54 +3.36 1.211 54.0% +27 -175 -286 69.2% +1.24 10–7 (59%) 5–3 (63%) 101.7 -1.91 2018 1650 103.6 -2.39 -1.26 0.893 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–2 — +0.21
26 2022 1886 151.2 +2.51 +1.53 1.100 52.0% +86 +5 — 61.2% +0.68 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 99.1 +0.40 2019 1574 111.3 -0.80 -0.46 0.996 50.1% — +121 +52 44.8% -0.31 0–7 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.20
27 2023 1779 114.3 -0.99 -1.11 0.919 48.2% +118 +17 — 40.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.10 2020 1680 132.2 +1.94 -0.55 0.967 49.3% +16 — — 51.5% -0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–2 (60%) 106.2 +0.47
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1805 147.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.111 52.0% +24 -149 -144 57.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 8–6 (57%) 96.6 -0.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1804 144.1 +2.94 -1.21 1.009 50.3% +44 -170 -145 52.2% -0.08 6–10 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.2 -1.95
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1773 137.9 +1.67 -1.25 0.951 49.1% +77 -140 — 42.6% -0.41 5–7 (42%) 0–6 (0%) 92.1 -1.29
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1676 122.2 -0.04 -0.79 0.948 48.6% +36 -21 — 32.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.39
Career — 2114 150.2 +2.78 +1.61 1.089 51.8% +11 -6 -112 56.8% +0.53 61–49 (55%) 42–39 (52%) 103.2 -1.15 — 1856 140.0 +1.85 -0.58 1.004 50.0% +8 -8 -100 48.9% -0.10 41–61 (40%) 39–36 (52%) 94.4 -1.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.