H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Belinda Bencic vs Lin Zhu H2H: 2-0
Belinda Bencic holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Belinda Bencic leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Belinda Bencic won the 2023 US Open third round 7-6(1) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2023* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-6(1) 2-6 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2014* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Belinda Bencic | 7-5 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Belinda Bencic | #14 | #4 | 4,745 | 2,032 | 298 | 187 | 61.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Belinda Bencic | Lin Zhu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #612 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #184 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #32 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,886 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #43 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #98 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 48–21 | 69.6% | #8 | 1,923 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #12 | 1,850 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,848 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #17 | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,998 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |