H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daria Saville vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-1
Daria Saville and Qiang Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 1–0 on grass, while Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Wuhan fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 32
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2018* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 7-5 6-2 | Daria Saville | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2016* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Daria Saville | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Saville | #226 | #20 | 2,135 | 1,836 | 156 | 153 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daria Saville | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #539 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #25 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #35 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #242 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #450 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #53 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #204 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #108 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |