H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daria Saville vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-1

Daria Saville and Qiang Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daria Saville leads 1–0 on grass, while Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Wuhan Open third round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daria Saville
Australia Age 32 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Qiang Wang
China Age 34 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Qiang Wang #34 7-5 6-2 Daria Saville #33 Match data Sep 27, 2018* R16 Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Daria Saville #56 2-6 6-3 6-4 Qiang Wang #72 Match data Jun 29, 2016* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daria Saville #226 #20 2,135 1,858 159 156 50.5% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Qiang Wang #421 #12 2,946 1,931 129 127 50.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daria Saville Qiang Wang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2010 0–1 0.0% #539 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2012 1–1 50.0% #226 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2013 2–6 25.0% #149 1,462 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2014 1–1 50.0% #233 1,483 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #185 1,458 0 0
21 2015 20–21 48.8% #36 1,675 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #226 1,474 0 0
22 2016 27–20 57.4% #25 1,836 0 0 2014 1–2 33.3% #102 1,467 0 0
23 2017 33–22 60.0% #25 1,794 0 1 2015 4–14 22.2% #110 1,448 0 0
24 2018 27–23 54.0% #35 1,781 0 1 2016 9–12 42.9% #72 1,538 0 0
25 2019 6–16 27.3% #242 1,603 0 1 2017 24–19 55.8% #45 1,720 0 0
26 2020 1–1 50.0% #450 1,617 0 1 2018 37–21 63.8% #21 1,906 0 2
27 2021 2–2 50.0% #419 1,645 0 1 2019 23–18 56.1% #30 1,792 0 2
28 2022 19–15 55.9% #53 1,738 0 1 2020 7–6 53.8% #34 1,765 0 2
29 2023 6–8 42.9% #204 1,686 0 1 2021 10–14 41.7% #104 1,713 0 2
30 2024 11–14 44.0% #108 1,667 0 1 2022 13–13 50.0% #91 1,717 0 2
31 2025 3–5 37.5% #197 1,661 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2024 0–4 0.0% #376 1,623 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daria Saville Qiang Wang
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2015 13 17 30 43.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2016 17 13 30 56.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 2014 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2015 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2016 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2019 2 8 10 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 18 13 31 58.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2020 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 32 15 47 68.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2021 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2019 16 10 26 61.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2022 16 10 26 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2020 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2023 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2021 4 9 13 30.8% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
30 2024 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2022 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 2025 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 105 101 206 51.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 15 21 36 41.7% — 103 89 192 53.6% 21 27 48 43.8% 5 11 16 31.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 287/316 of Daria Saville's and 239/257 of Qiang Wang's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daria Saville Qiang Wang
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2010 1/1 5.0 4.0 46.6% 59.3% 38.7% 44.4% 33.3% 48.3% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 2/2 4.0 3.0 63.0% 65.8% 46.5% 33.3% 60.0% 58.2% 55.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 8/8 2.9 6.5 55.6% 56.5% 36.1% 47.6% 53.1% 47.6% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 2/2 2.5 6.0 61.7% 57.5% 39.0% 39.8% 50.0% 50.3% 47.0% 2012 3/3 0.0 2.3 63.7% 51.1% 37.0% 33.2% 54.2% 46.3% 37.9%
21 2015 31/41 2.5 4.6 66.2% 62.3% 49.2% 54.6% 52.2% 57.6% 41.8% 2013 1/2 2.0 1.0 69.4% 59.3% 57.7% 37.5% 26.3% 58.8% 47.6%
22 2016 37/47 1.9 3.9 63.1% 62.0% 47.1% 52.1% 44.7% 56.5% 44.0% 2014 2/3 4.0 1.0 56.4% 70.6% 54.4% 81.8% 42.4% 62.7% 49.1%
23 2017 54/55 2.7 4.8 62.9% 64.0% 45.6% 46.7% 50.8% 57.1% 45.6% 2015 10/18 2.5 3.0 64.1% 59.0% 45.4% 48.0% 33.2% 53.6% 37.0%
24 2018 48/51 1.8 7.7 65.7% 62.8% 37.3% 53.1% 51.4% 54.1% 45.5% 2016 18/22 2.2 2.9 63.0% 62.4% 44.4% 53.3% 46.6% 55.9% 41.6%
25 2019 21/22 1.0 4.2 66.4% 56.8% 43.9% 45.7% 46.5% 52.4% 41.3% 2017 43/43 2.7 1.8 63.1% 63.9% 50.5% 55.7% 49.0% 58.9% 46.3%
26 2020 2/2 0.5 5.0 59.8% 62.1% 52.1% 75.0% 73.2% 58.6% 43.5% 2018 57/58 2.6 1.7 62.4% 65.2% 48.8% 52.5% 49.8% 59.1% 47.4%
27 2021 4/4 2.0 4.0 57.5% 66.2% 46.6% 52.5% 44.5% 57.9% 47.1% 2019 40/41 2.4 2.1 61.7% 63.9% 49.5% 56.1% 52.1% 58.0% 43.6%
28 2022 33/34 2.2 5.0 64.1% 64.5% 44.3% 58.4% 45.6% 57.5% 44.2% 2020 13/13 1.3 1.8 60.2% 63.2% 53.7% 51.1% 44.2% 59.4% 43.6%
29 2023 14/14 1.3 4.8 63.7% 61.1% 38.3% 45.4% 53.3% 53.3% 45.8% 2021 22/24 3.5 3.6 58.5% 60.7% 44.5% 53.9% 39.5% 53.9% 43.9%
30 2024 25/25 2.1 6.2 67.4% 57.8% 41.9% 59.3% 57.6% 52.5% 45.9% 2022 26/26 2.1 1.7 63.8% 61.7% 47.7% 53.8% 50.2% 56.6% 42.6%
31 2025 5/8 1.0 5.0 69.5% 56.9% 39.9% 48.9% 60.2% 51.1% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 4/4 1.0 2.5 61.2% 54.3% 27.9% 38.6% 51.4% 45.2% 36.5%
Career — 287/316 2.1 5.3 64.3% 61.8% 43.5% 51.8% 50.3% 55.3% 44.3% — 239/257 2.4 2.1 62.2% 63.0% 48.1% 53.5% 47.8% 57.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daria Saville Qiang Wang
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2010 1494 101.6 +1.65 -1.80 0.633 40.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2012 1508 107.7 +0.29 +3.39 1.317 57.0% — — — 50.0% +1.50 — 0–1 — -0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2013 1462 101.0 -2.47 -1.24 0.771 44.0% +3 — — 26.3% -1.63 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2014 1483 109.1 +0.25 +0.24 0.946 48.8% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.01 2012 1459 93.4 -2.59 -4.30 0.705 42.2% +20 — — 14.3% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.34
21 2015 1675 139.1 +0.59 +1.21 0.985 50.0% -73 -34 -29 50.0% -0.05 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 106.8 -1.55 2013 1474 106.8 +1.03 +1.18 1.155 52.7% — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.12
22 2016 1837 143.7 +0.70 +1.71 1.011 50.3% -38 -114 -194 54.4% +0.28 7–5 (58%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -1.91 2014 1468 102.3 -0.40 -0.04 1.315 56.2% +13 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.36
23 2017 1795 139.8 +0.45 +2.93 1.061 51.3% +20 -6 -173 57.7% +0.43 14–13 (52%) 7–12 (37%) 96.3 +1.08 2015 1449 112.8 -2.12 -2.78 0.797 45.2% +43 — — 31.8% -1.18 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — +0.30
24 2018 1781 141.0 -2.19 +2.60 0.991 49.8% +14 0 -108 52.2% -0.08 11–8 (58%) 13–1 (93%) 108.4 -0.58 2016 1539 124.4 +0.50 0.00 0.943 48.8% +23 -27 — 43.5% -0.56 2–4 (33%) 1–0 — -0.52
25 2019 1604 107.6 -2.88 -1.35 0.868 46.7% +84 +22 +39 27.7% -1.28 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 99.5 -0.63 2017 1721 140.3 +2.20 +2.13 1.126 52.2% +4 -118 — 57.4% +0.51 5–10 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 97.5 -0.59
26 2020 1617 108.7 +0.59 +1.52 1.052 51.9% — — — 60.0% +0.40 0–1 — — -0.14 2018 1906 152.9 +2.58 +4.18 1.157 53.0% +14 -273 — 61.1% +1.10 9–5 (64%) 1–3 (25%) 102.8 -1.43
27 2021 1646 128.1 +1.67 +2.64 1.117 52.5% +67 — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.38 2019 1793 132.7 +1.42 +0.89 1.038 50.7% +55 -204 -179 55.6% +0.16 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.2 +1.10
28 2022 1738 136.6 +0.54 +0.98 1.039 50.8% +82 -119 -95 53.7% +0.39 5–4 (56%) 1–5 (17%) 97.2 +0.65 2020 1766 129.1 +2.56 +1.23 1.073 51.4% +32 — — 53.3% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 98.7 +0.36
29 2023 1687 124.8 -0.97 +1.63 0.980 49.5% +59 +5 — 45.2% +0.03 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -0.28 2021 1714 121.2 -1.69 +0.38 0.952 48.9% -23 -55 — 44.1% -0.42 5–6 (45%) 3–1 (75%) 100.4 +0.25
30 2024 1668 125.0 -3.56 +1.68 0.966 49.2% +38 -36 +6 45.9% -0.21 5–6 (45%) 4–4 (50%) 99.3 -0.44 2022 1717 128.6 +0.18 +0.03 0.981 49.6% +35 — -160 45.2% -0.11 8–2 (80%) 2–8 (20%) 101.7 -0.05
31 2025 1662 123.9 -0.99 -0.65 0.821 45.9% +19 — — 35.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1624 97.7 -3.97 -0.81 0.667 41.0% +19 — — 11.1% -3.00 0–1 — — -0.38
Career — 1859 140.0 -0.68 +1.60 0.990 49.8% +11 -29 -92 49.6% -0.03 59–51 (54%) 42–41 (51%) 102.9 -1.15 — 1931 138.9 +1.10 +1.45 1.038 50.7% +22 -151 -171 50.5% +0.07 38–44 (46%) 22–21 (51%) 100.4 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.