H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Donna Vekic vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-1
Donna Vekic and Qiang Wang are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on clay, while Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2019 Madrid second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2019 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Donna Vekic | 7-5 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2017* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 0-6 6-4 6-2 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Donna Vekic | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |