H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Arina Rodionova H2H: 1-0
Elena-Gabriela Ruse holds a 1–0 lead over Arina Rodionova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena-Gabriela Ruse leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena-Gabriela Ruse won the 2022 Melbourne 1 third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2022* | Melbourne 1 | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-3 6-2 | Arina Rodionova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Arina Rodionova | #439 | #97 | 761 | 1,560 | 17 | 46 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Arina Rodionova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #266 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #242 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #169 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #152 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #208 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |