H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elena-Gabriela Ruse vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 2-0
Elena-Gabriela Ruse holds a 2–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena-Gabriela Ruse leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Elena-Gabriela Ruse won the 2021 Palermo fourth round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 28
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2023 | Doha | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 6-7(5) 7-6(1) 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Jul 23, 2021* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | (w/o) | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Jul 8, 2021* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 7-5 7-6(1) | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | #72 | #51 | 1,127 | 1,880 | 61 | 82 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena-Gabriela Ruse | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #251 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2021 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #87 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2023 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,698 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2024 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #121 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #88 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2026 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,827 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |