H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elena Rybakina vs Alison Van Uytvanck H2H: 3-0
Elena Rybakina holds a 3–0 lead over Alison Van Uytvanck in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Elena Rybakina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elena Rybakina won the 2022 Indian Wells second round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KAZ
Age 27
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 32
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 6-1 7-5 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2020* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Elena Rybakina | 5-7 6-2 7-6(8) | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2019* | S-Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Elena Rybakina | 6-3 6-4 | Alison Van Uytvanck | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Rybakina | #2 | #2 | 8,705 | 2,247 | 296 | 125 | 70.3% | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
| Alison Van Uytvanck | #229 | #37 | 1,355 | 1,765 | 119 | 147 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Rybakina | Alison Van Uytvanck | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #435 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #199 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2018 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #182 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #37 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #106 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #14 | 1,858 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #121 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #21 | 1,906 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #76 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2023 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #4 | 2,017 | 1 | 5 | 2018 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2024 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,031 | 1 | 8 | 2019 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #47 | 1,713 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2025 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #5 | 2,168 | 1 | 11 | 2020 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2026 | 34–11 | 75.6% | #2 | 2,104 | 2 | 13 | 2021 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #58 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #344 | 1,682 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |