H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elina Svitolina vs Lin Zhu H2H: 2-0
Elina Svitolina holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elina Svitolina leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elina Svitolina won the 2017 Beijing second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 31
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2017 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 6-3 6-2 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Mar 5, 2016* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Elina Svitolina | 6-3 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elina Svitolina | #10 | #3 | 6,085 | 2,143 | 429 | 227 | 65.4% | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 20 |
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elina Svitolina | Lin Zhu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #45 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #19 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #14 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 50–15 | 76.9% | #6 | 1,942 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 1,983 | 0 | 13 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #6 | 1,963 | 0 | 13 | 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #5 | 1,928 | 0 | 15 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,900 | 0 | 16 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #240 | 1,765 | 0 | 16 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 18–9 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,886 | 0 | 17 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #23 | 1,906 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 33–14 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,980 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35–10 | 77.8% | #10 | 2,085 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |