H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Beatriz Haddad Maia H2H: 1-0
Elise Mertens holds a 1–0 lead over Beatriz Haddad Maia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2018 Hobart fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 30
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2018* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-4 6-4 | Beatriz Haddad Maia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | #153 | #10 | 3,194 | 1,944 | 147 | 135 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Beatriz Haddad Maia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #246 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #71 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #121 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2021 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #15 | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #11 | 1,893 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,895 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2025 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #58 | 1,769 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 0–11 | 0.0% | #153 | 1,537 | 0 | 4 |