H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Elise Mertens vs Fiona Ferro H2H: 2-0
Elise Mertens holds a 2–0 lead over Fiona Ferro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elise Mertens leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elise Mertens won the 2022 Sydney third round 6-2 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2022* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elise Mertens | 6-2 7-6(5) | Fiona Ferro | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elise Mertens | 6-2 6-0 | Fiona Ferro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Mertens | #24 | #12 | 3,685 | 2,013 | 311 | 199 | 61.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 10 |
| Fiona Ferro | #189 | #39 | 1,649 | 1,799 | 55 | 72 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Mertens | Fiona Ferro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #35 | 1,737 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #102 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #12 | 1,821 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #63 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2019 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #17 | 1,836 | 0 | 5 | 2020 | 11–4 | 73.3% | #42 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2020 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #20 | 1,934 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #103 | 1,667 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2021 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #411 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2022 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #29 | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #161 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #34 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,866 | 0 | 10 | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2026 | 20–13 | 60.6% | #24 | 1,908 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |