H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Harriet Dart vs Jil Teichmann H2H: 1-2
Jil Teichmann holds a 2–1 lead over Harriet Dart in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jil Teichmann leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Harriet Dart leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jil Teichmann won the 2025 Singapore third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2025 | Singapore | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 6-3 6-1 | Harriet Dart | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2023* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jil Teichmann | 7-5 6-1 | Harriet Dart | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2022* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Harriet Dart | 7-6(7) 4-6 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harriet Dart | #152 | #70 | 924 | 1,731 | 44 | 76 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harriet Dart | Jil Teichmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #98 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #121 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #172 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |