H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Harriet Dart vs Rebecca Marino H2H: 1-0
Harriet Dart holds a 1–0 lead over Rebecca Marino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Harriet Dart leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Harriet Dart won the 2023 Nottingham third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2023* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Harriet Dart | 6-4 6-2 | Rebecca Marino | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2023 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Rebecca Marino | 7-6(1) 6-7(5) 6-1 | Harriet Dart | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harriet Dart | #152 | #70 | 924 | 1,731 | 44 | 76 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rebecca Marino | #361 | #38 | 1,322 | 1,726 | 48 | 77 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harriet Dart | Rebecca Marino | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #356 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #443 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #178 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #104 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #314 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #64 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #98 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #121 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2024 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #104 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #215 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #172 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2026 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #145 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #63 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #176 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #102 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |