H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:32 UTC
Jasmine Paolini vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Jasmine Paolini holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jasmine Paolini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jasmine Paolini won the 2021 Gippsland Trophy third round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 30
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2021* | Gippsland Trophy | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Jasmine Paolini | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | #15 | #4 | 5,865 | 2,058 | 172 | 135 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jasmine Paolini | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #53 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #30 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #4 | 1,982 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #8 | 2,005 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #15 | 1,892 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |