H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Jessica Pegula vs Qiang Wang H2H: 2-0
Jessica Pegula holds a 2–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jessica Pegula leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jessica Pegula won the 2022 Roland Garros first round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Jessica Pegula | 6-2 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2021* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jessica Pegula | 6-3 6-1 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jessica Pegula | #3 | #3 | 6,768 | 2,156 | 285 | 134 | 68.0% | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jessica Pegula | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #203 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #155 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #111 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #83 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #63 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #18 | 1,944 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #3 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 54–17 | 76.1% | #5 | 2,084 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 52–21 | 71.2% | #6 | 2,057 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #3 | 2,113 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |