H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:34 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Bianca Andreescu H2H: 0-2
Bianca Andreescu holds a 2–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bianca Andreescu leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bianca Andreescu won the 2022 Guadalajara 2 second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 26
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q3 | Grass | Bianca Andreescu | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2022* | Guadalajara 2 | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Bianca Andreescu | 6-2 6-4 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2019 | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Bianca Andreescu | 6-1 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Bianca Andreescu | #173 | #4 | 5,331 | 2,042 | 107 | 75 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Bianca Andreescu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #185 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 35–8 | 81.4% | #5 | 1,985 | 1 | 3 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #46 | 1,855 | 1 | 3 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #46 | 1,904 | 1 | 3 |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #95 | 1,780 | 1 | 3 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #132 | 1,776 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #228 | 1,727 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,712 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |