H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Jil Teichmann vs Ysaline Bonaventure H2H: 0-1
Ysaline Bonaventure holds a 1–0 lead over Jil Teichmann in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ysaline Bonaventure leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ysaline Bonaventure won the 2022 Tallinn fourth round 7-6(8) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 29
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 31
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2022* | Tallinn | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ysaline Bonaventure | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2019 | Mallorca | WTA 250 | Q2 | Grass | Ysaline Bonaventure | 6-3 6-3 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2019 | Budapest | WTA 250 | Q2 | Hard | Ysaline Bonaventure | 7-5 7-5 | Jil Teichmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jil Teichmann | #119 | #21 | 2,101 | 1,876 | 98 | 107 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ysaline Bonaventure | #939 | #81 | 746 | 1,711 | 28 | 50 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jil Teichmann | Ysaline Bonaventure | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2018 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2019 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #69 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #229 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2020 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2022 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #35 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #117 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2023 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #147 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2024 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #135 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #235 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2025 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #123 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2026 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #119 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #189 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |