H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Kristina Mladenovic vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-3
Qiang Wang holds a 3–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Qiang Wang leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2018 Indian Wells third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2018* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-1 6-2 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2017* | Toray Pan Pacific Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-0 6-0 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2017* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-1 6-4 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kristina Mladenovic | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |