H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kurumi Nara vs Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik H2H: 2-0
Kurumi Nara holds a 2–0 lead over Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kurumi Nara leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kurumi Nara won the 2014 Auckland third round 6-1 4-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2014* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-1 4-0 (ret.) | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kurumi Nara | 6-2 6-2 | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | #1,168 | #59 | 972 | 1,601 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kurumi Nara | Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #61 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #236 | 1,420 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #157 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #269 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #178 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |