H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:17 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Aliaksandra Sasnovich H2H: 1-1
Lin Zhu and Aliaksandra Sasnovich are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2025 Nottingham third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 32
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2025 | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Lin Zhu | 6-4 6-1 | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2017 | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | 4-5 7-5 6-1 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Aliaksandra Sasnovich | #143 | #29 | 1,570 | 1,881 | 157 | 171 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Aliaksandra Sasnovich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #87 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,826 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #62 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #90 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #107 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #30 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #90 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #114 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |