H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Alizé Cornet H2H: 1-2
Alizé Cornet holds a 2–1 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Alizé Cornet leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2022 Guadalajara 2 second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 36
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2022* | Guadalajara 2 | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Alizé Cornet | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2019* | New York | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 7-6(5) 4-0 (ret.) | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2019 | Bronx | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Alizé Cornet | 7-6(5) 4-0 (ret.) | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Alizé Cornet | #460 | #11 | 3,256 | 1,884 | 376 | 358 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Alizé Cornet | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #196 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #55 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #16 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #49 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #78 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #88 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #44 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #27 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #19 | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #43 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,702 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #38 | 1,750 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,693 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #59 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #53 | 1,763 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #61 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #117 | 1,684 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #391 | 1,613 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,558 | 0 | 6 |