H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Anett Kontaveit H2H: 0-2
Anett Kontaveit holds a 2–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anett Kontaveit leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anett Kontaveit won the 2019 Doha third round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
EST
Age 30
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2019* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
| Sep 22, 2016* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Anett Kontaveit | 6-1 3-6 6-0 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Anett Kontaveit | #81 | #2 | 4,721 | 2,109 | 205 | 138 | 59.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Anett Kontaveit | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #159 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #91 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #112 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #34 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #20 | 1,832 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #23 | 1,912 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 49–17 | 74.2% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 5 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #17 | 1,882 | 0 | 6 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #81 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |