H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Kurumi Nara H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Kurumi Nara in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2017 Taipei fourth round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 34
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Kurumi Nara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kurumi Nara | #246 | #32 | 1,412 | 1,700 | 82 | 116 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Kurumi Nara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #130 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #148 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #44 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #81 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–13 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #185 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |