H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Simona Halep H2H: 0-1
Simona Halep holds a 1–0 lead over Lin Zhu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simona Halep leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simona Halep won the 2014 Beijing third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 34
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2014* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Simona Halep | 7-5 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Simona Halep | #873 | #1 | 8,290 | 2,111 | 446 | 197 | 69.4% | 2 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Simona Halep | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #47 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #11 | 2,004 | 0 | 6 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #3 | 1,969 | 0 | 8 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 49–16 | 75.4% | #2 | 1,929 | 0 | 11 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 41–14 | 74.5% | #4 | 1,997 | 0 | 14 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #1 | 1,973 | 0 | 15 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 45–12 | 78.9% | #1 | 2,005 | 1 | 18 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #4 | 1,938 | 2 | 19 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 23–3 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,056 | 2 | 22 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 2 | 22 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #10 | 1,986 | 2 | 24 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,913 | 2 | 24 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #873 | 1,887 | 2 | 24 |