Lin Zhu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 3 | 1 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Rebecca Marino | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 24, 2023 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 17, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Lin Zhu and Victoria Azarenka are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2023 US Open second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | 6-3 6-3 | Victoria Azarenka | Match data | Aug 31, 2023* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Victoria Azarenka | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Lin Zhu | Match data | Jan 24, 2023* | R16 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #173 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 88 | 116 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Victoria Azarenka | #455 | #1 | 10,955 | 2,249 | 582 | 268 | 68.5% | 2 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 21 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Victoria Azarenka | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #30 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,872 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 55–18 | 75.3% | #3 | 2,020 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 69–12 | 85.2% | #1 | 2,178 | 1 | 14 |
| 23 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 43–12 | 78.2% | #2 | 2,126 | 2 | 17 |
| 24 | 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,980 | 2 | 17 |
| 25 | 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #22 | 1,985 | 2 | 17 |
| 26 | 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #13 | 2,046 | 2 | 20 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #114 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #205 | 2,018 | 2 | 20 |
| 28 | 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #51 | 1,892 | 2 | 20 |
| 29 | 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #50 | 1,853 | 2 | 20 |
| 30 | 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 19–6 | 76.0% | #13 | 1,959 | 2 | 21 |
| 31 | 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #27 | 2,010 | 2 | 21 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #26 | 1,941 | 2 | 21 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #22 | 1,802 | 2 | 21 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,900 | 2 | 21 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,831 | 2 | 21 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Victoria Azarenka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21 | 10 | 31 | 67.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 32 | 10 | 42 | 76.2% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2014 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 32 | 12 | 44 | 72.7% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2015 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 32 | 12 | 44 | 72.7% | 16 | 4 | 20 | 80.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2016 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 47 | 6 | 53 | 88.7% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2017 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 32 | 8 | 40 | 80.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2020 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22 | 2 | 24 | 91.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2023 | 24 | 19 | 43 | 55.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 78.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 19 | 9 | 28 | 67.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 62.1% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 79 | 92 | 171 | 46.2% | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0.0% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | — | — | — | — | 406 | 169 | 575 | 70.6% | 116 | 66 | 182 | 63.7% | 60 | 32 | 92 | 65.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 200/204 of Lin Zhu's and 743/846 of Victoria Azarenka's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Victoria Azarenka | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 9/21 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 58.1% | 59.6% | 40.0% | 46.4% | 50.1% | 51.3% | 43.7% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 37/46 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 59.8% | 65.1% | 46.3% | 57.3% | 47.8% | 57.7% | 47.3% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 49/60 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 67.1% | 68.3% | 46.8% | 58.0% | 54.3% | 61.2% | 49.5% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 55/60 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 71.8% | 65.3% | 45.5% | 54.3% | 55.0% | 59.9% | 51.5% |
| 20 | 2014 | 6/7 | 2.7 | 5.5 | 50.3% | 62.4% | 46.3% | 59.1% | 49.5% | 53.1% | 43.0% | 2010 | 53/62 | 1.5 | 3.8 | 70.6% | 65.5% | 44.8% | 53.2% | 57.4% | 59.2% | 50.1% |
| 21 | 2015 | 10/10 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 57.3% | 60.4% | 48.5% | 50.0% | 54.0% | 55.4% | 38.8% | 2011 | 66/73 | 1.3 | 3.2 | 70.3% | 66.5% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 49.7% | 60.5% | 50.6% |
| 22 | 2016 | 9/10 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 58.5% | 63.5% | 51.5% | 60.6% | 49.9% | 58.4% | 37.8% | 2012 | 65/81 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 67.6% | 68.9% | 48.0% | 58.2% | 54.9% | 62.2% | 52.6% |
| 23 | 2017 | 14/14 | 2.5 | 4.4 | 57.6% | 67.5% | 43.8% | 48.6% | 41.3% | 57.3% | 43.2% | 2013 | 50/55 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 66.9% | 65.9% | 41.8% | 56.9% | 54.0% | 58.0% | 54.1% |
| 24 | 2018 | 10/10 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 60.3% | 61.6% | 44.3% | 51.9% | 52.1% | 55.0% | 44.2% | 2014 | 22/24 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 67.5% | 65.6% | 39.5% | 57.5% | 52.4% | 57.5% | 45.7% |
| 25 | 2019 | 19/19 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 67.0% | 54.9% | 42.5% | 40.5% | 50.0% | 50.7% | 42.8% | 2015 | 39/45 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 70.2% | 67.9% | 48.3% | 55.9% | 56.0% | 61.9% | 48.2% |
| 26 | 2020 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 66.5% | 60.0% | 41.9% | 49.2% | 40.7% | 53.8% | 42.6% | 2016 | 27/29 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 65.4% | 73.5% | 46.9% | 64.1% | 51.5% | 64.3% | 52.3% |
| 27 | 2021 | 11/11 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 64.9% | 60.5% | 45.0% | 55.5% | 52.6% | 55.1% | 46.1% | 2017 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 64.3% | 67.5% | 49.0% | 51.8% | 37.2% | 60.3% | 42.9% |
| 28 | 2022 | 17/17 | 1.1 | 2.2 | 65.0% | 56.7% | 44.0% | 51.7% | 46.9% | 52.0% | 40.1% | 2018 | 28/29 | 2.6 | 4.0 | 66.8% | 64.3% | 42.7% | 51.9% | 51.6% | 57.1% | 46.6% |
| 29 | 2023 | 51/52 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 65.3% | 61.7% | 48.4% | 55.9% | 51.0% | 57.1% | 43.5% | 2019 | 38/38 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 61.4% | 65.0% | 44.4% | 52.8% | 47.9% | 57.2% | 47.2% |
| 30 | 2024 | 28/28 | 1.9 | 2.7 | 59.4% | 64.1% | 46.4% | 44.1% | 42.3% | 56.7% | 42.0% | 2020 | 24/25 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 69.0% | 64.4% | 45.7% | 54.5% | 52.5% | 58.7% | 48.8% |
| 31 | 2025 | 16/17 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 66.8% | 60.3% | 45.2% | 47.6% | 45.8% | 55.3% | 44.3% | 2021 | 36/43 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 62.5% | 66.2% | 44.5% | 51.0% | 51.2% | 57.9% | 49.6% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 37/38 | 2.2 | 4.7 | 60.5% | 67.3% | 44.2% | 51.0% | 50.2% | 57.8% | 46.9% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 42/45 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 63.3% | 68.1% | 45.1% | 51.9% | 47.7% | 59.4% | 46.0% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 45/45 | 2.8 | 4.1 | 64.6% | 67.2% | 44.2% | 61.4% | 47.6% | 59.0% | 46.2% |
| 35 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15/21 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 62.3% | 61.4% | 43.3% | 49.7% | 57.0% | 54.3% | 46.1% |
| Career | — | 200/204 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 62.8% | 61.1% | 46.0% | 50.7% | 48.0% | 55.4% | 42.6% | — | 743/851 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 66.4% | 66.6% | 45.3% | 55.1% | 52.0% | 59.4% | 49.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Lin Zhu | Victoria Azarenka | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1525 | 103.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.63 | — | — | — | +0.52 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1570 | 128.4 | -1.78 | -0.93 | 0.897 | 47.6% | +53 | -79 | — | 46.9% | +0.18 | 2–5 (29%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.5 | -0.56 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1817 | 144.9 | +1.83 | +3.32 | 1.118 | 52.3% | +2 | -215 | -230 | 65.0% | +1.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.3 | -0.21 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1873 | 154.6 | +5.10 | +4.52 | 1.274 | 55.2% | -23 | -60 | -274 | 69.4% | +1.66 | 5–6 (45%) | 5–3 (63%) | 100.7 | +1.30 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1940 | 165.5 | +4.27 | +7.62 | 1.283 | 55.3% | +35 | -48 | -221 | 74.2% | +1.69 | 6–8 (43%) | 10–4 (71%) | 101.7 | -1.25 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1521 | 104.1 | -1.07 | -0.56 | 0.918 | 48.3% | +15 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.46 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.04 | 2010 | 1948 | 163.1 | +3.61 | +6.46 | 1.229 | 54.3% | +50 | -169 | -123 | 70.0% | +1.62 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.3 | +0.88 |
| 21 | 2015 | 1512 | 107.1 | -1.28 | -2.85 | 0.871 | 47.4% | +26 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.50 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.65 | 2011 | 2020 | 163.1 | +4.84 | +7.25 | 1.283 | 55.2% | +14 | -108 | -106 | 76.4% | +1.97 | 9–7 (56%) | 7–2 (78%) | 100.1 | -0.87 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1555 | 109.1 | +1.20 | -2.59 | 0.910 | 48.5% | +15 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.59 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.66 | 2012 | 2179 | 172.2 | +6.83 | +9.26 | 1.391 | 57.1% | +14 | -159 | -139 | 81.5% | +2.40 | 13–1 (93%) | 9–7 (56%) | 107.9 | -3.63 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1578 | 123.1 | +0.74 | -0.55 | 1.011 | 50.1% | +10 | — | — | 42.4% | -0.12 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–4 (0%) | 98.9 | -0.01 | 2013 | 2127 | 170.4 | +3.42 | +9.80 | 1.286 | 55.8% | +45 | -52 | — | 75.2% | +1.93 | 11–4 (73%) | 9–1 (90%) | 107.2 | -1.19 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1547 | 117.4 | -0.29 | -0.28 | 0.981 | 49.8% | +12 | — | — | 47.6% | 0.00 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–0 | — | +0.19 | 2014 | 1981 | 145.7 | +1.37 | +1.88 | 1.075 | 51.6% | +69 | — | +2 | 57.9% | +0.70 | 6–3 (67%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.1 | +0.19 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1629 | 125.7 | -3.27 | +0.44 | 0.867 | 46.7% | +20 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.46 | 1–4 (20%) | 3–4 (43%) | 96.4 | -0.49 | 2015 | 1985 | 163.4 | +3.97 | +6.66 | 1.263 | 54.8% | +4 | +65 | +22 | 71.6% | +1.60 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.5 | -3.58 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1606 | 108.9 | -2.09 | -0.72 | 0.923 | 48.0% | +18 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.62 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.71 | 2016 | 2046 | 160.1 | +5.89 | +7.41 | 1.465 | 57.8% | +75 | -18 | — | 87.3% | +2.89 | 3–0 (100%) | 3–0 (100%) | 105.1 | +0.93 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1563 | 105.8 | -0.33 | +0.99 | 1.028 | 50.5% | -6 | — | — | 40.0% | -0.48 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.7 | +0.09 | 2017 | 2019 | 110.5 | +1.49 | -0.08 | 1.082 | 50.5% | — | — | -2 | 53.3% | +0.33 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–1 | — | -0.17 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1592 | 112.9 | -3.24 | -2.37 | 0.836 | 46.4% | +24 | — | — | 41.0% | -0.77 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.0 | +1.07 | 2018 | 1892 | 145.2 | +0.15 | +3.55 | 1.085 | 51.8% | +122 | +74 | +62 | 58.6% | +0.79 | 4–2 (67%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.8 | -0.47 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1742 | 140.5 | +0.07 | +0.82 | 1.014 | 50.3% | -12 | — | -149 | 54.3% | +0.16 | 7–7 (50%) | 10–4 (71%) | 106.6 | -1.61 | 2019 | 1853 | 151.2 | +0.69 | +4.19 | 1.101 | 52.1% | +42 | +134 | +85 | 56.1% | +0.62 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–1 (75%) | 94.5 | -3.62 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1656 | 126.9 | 0.00 | -0.71 | 0.971 | 49.4% | +61 | -323 | -13 | 48.4% | -0.24 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 93.5 | +0.26 | 2020 | 1959 | 158.3 | +1.76 | +5.63 | 1.182 | 53.7% | +34 | +20 | — | 69.2% | +1.50 | 4–2 (67%) | 3–0 (100%) | 104.8 | -1.12 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1680 | 133.0 | -0.52 | +0.63 | 0.991 | 49.7% | +21 | — | -97 | 43.9% | -0.34 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.7 | -0.13 | 2021 | 2010 | 152.2 | +2.04 | +6.39 | 1.179 | 53.7% | +34 | +16 | +34 | 69.4% | +1.14 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.8 | -0.48 |
| 32 | 2026 | 1644 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1941 | 149.0 | +1.08 | +3.67 | 1.112 | 52.4% | +23 | +72 | — | 61.0% | +0.79 | 8–4 (67%) | 7–4 (64%) | 103.8 | +0.63 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1803 | 150.1 | +2.06 | +3.24 | 1.134 | 52.6% | +64 | +108 | +178 | 56.8% | +0.84 | 5–8 (38%) | 7–10 (41%) | 90.7 | +1.56 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1900 | 158.8 | +2.22 | +3.55 | 1.126 | 52.7% | +28 | +27 | +154 | 64.0% | +1.17 | 12–6 (67%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.4 | +0.43 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1832 | 137.2 | -1.16 | +1.90 | 1.008 | 50.1% | +50 | +34 | +224 | 43.2% | -0.42 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–3 (50%) | 99.3 | -0.03 |
| Career | — | 1805 | 129.3 | -0.73 | -0.31 | 0.955 | 49.0% | +14 | -323 | -88 | 45.8% | -0.37 | 25–37 (40%) | 28–26 (52%) | 98.2 | +0.70 | — | 2249 | 165.9 | +3.19 | +5.72 | 1.211 | 54.1% | +34 | -41 | -35 | 68.1% | +1.42 | 123–85 (59%) | 92–70 (57%) | 101.9 | -1.29 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lesia Tsurenko | 1 | 3 | 4 | Oct 2, 2023 | H2H |
| Xiyu Wang | 3 | 1 | 4 | Sep 14, 2023 | H2H |
| Rebecca Marino | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 24, 2023 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 1, 2021 | H2H |
| Diana Shnaider | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 17, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serena Williams | 5 | 19 | 24 | Sep 12, 2020 | H2H |
| Agnieszka Radwanska | 13 | 5 | 18 | Mar 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Maria Sharapova | 7 | 8 | 15 | May 16, 2015 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 8 | 5 | 13 | Mar 21, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 10 | 2 | 12 | Jun 18, 2021 | H2H |