H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Vitalia Diatchenko H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Vitalia Diatchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2022 Prague third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2022* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 6-1 6-1 | Vitalia Diatchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Vitalia Diatchenko | #438 | #71 | 791 | 1,624 | 14 | 49 | 22.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Vitalia Diatchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #130 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #81 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #330 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #176 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #90 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #137 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #179 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |