H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Lin Zhu vs Yulia Putintseva H2H: 1-0
Lin Zhu holds a 1–0 lead over Yulia Putintseva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lin Zhu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lin Zhu won the 2019 New York third round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KAZ
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2019* | New York | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Lin Zhu | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Yulia Putintseva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lin Zhu | #130 | #31 | 1,464 | 1,805 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yulia Putintseva | #82 | #20 | 2,138 | 1,991 | 261 | 255 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Lin Zhu | Yulia Putintseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #134 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #176 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #124 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #109 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #113 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #115 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #120 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #77 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #33 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #91 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #52 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #114 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #44 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,836 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #42 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 2025 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #168 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #51 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #29 | 1,934 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–26 | 36.6% | #71 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |