H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Marie Bouzkova vs Qiang Wang H2H: 2-1
Marie Bouzkova holds a 2–1 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marie Bouzkova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marie Bouzkova won the 2022 Indian Wells first round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 27
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Marie Bouzkova | 6-3 7-6(5) | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2022* | Guadalajara | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Marie Bouzkova | 6-3 6-3 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2019* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-3 6-3 | Marie Bouzkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marie Bouzkova | #21 | #21 | 2,019 | 1,915 | 164 | 135 | 54.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Marie Bouzkova | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #52 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2023 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2024 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #44 | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2025 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #42 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2026 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #21 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |