H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 10:32 UTC
Mayar Sherif vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Mayar Sherif in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2022 Monterrey fourth round 6-0 6-7(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
EGY
Age 30
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2022* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Qiang Wang | 6-0 6-7(2) 6-3 | Mayar Sherif | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayar Sherif | #97 | #31 | 1,385 | 1,831 | 41 | 77 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mayar Sherif | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #63 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #52 | 1,782 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 1–13 | 7.1% | #109 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |