H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Misaki Doi vs Qiang Wang H2H: 0-1
Qiang Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Misaki Doi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Qiang Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Qiang Wang won the 2021 Parma third round 6-2 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 35
Left-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2021* | Parma | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Qiang Wang | 6-2 5-7 6-1 | Misaki Doi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Misaki Doi | #258 | #30 | 1,555 | 1,739 | 100 | 166 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Misaki Doi | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #120 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #93 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #90 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #54 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #40 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #122 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #128 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #82 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2020 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #83 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2021 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2022 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #173 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #258 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |