H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Polona Hercog vs Qiang Wang H2H: 1-0
Polona Hercog holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Polona Hercog leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Polona Hercog won the 2015 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Polona Hercog | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polona Hercog | #228 | #35 | 1,605 | 1,768 | 170 | 212 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Polona Hercog | Qiang Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,701 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 2014 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 2015 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 2016 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #85 | 1,626 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #49 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #134 | 1,590 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,565 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,628 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |