H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Qiang Wang vs Ana Konjuh H2H: 0-1
Ana Konjuh holds a 1–0 lead over Qiang Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ana Konjuh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ana Konjuh won the 2021 Istanbul fourth round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 28
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2021* | Istanbul | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Ana Konjuh | 6-1 6-4 | Qiang Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qiang Wang | #421 | #12 | 2,946 | 1,925 | 128 | 125 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ana Konjuh | #647 | #20 | 1,830 | 1,786 | 84 | 80 | 51.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Qiang Wang | Ana Konjuh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #93 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #226 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #47 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 2015 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #110 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #44 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #385 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1282 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #104 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #647 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 2022 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |